Lumbar interbody fusion vs dynamic stabilization system for degenerative lumbar disease

MA Hui,LI Zhong-hai,ZHU Xiao-dong,BAI Yu-shu,WANG Chuan-feng,WU Da-jiang,CHEN Yu,LI Ming
2011-01-01
Journal of Spinal Surgery
Abstract:Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness and postoperative complications of lumbar interbody fusion and dynamic stabilization system(the Isobar system) for degenerative lumbar disease,in an attempt to explore an optimal surgical procedure.Methods From January 2009 to December 2010,32 degenerative disease(L4/L5) cases were randomly and equally assigned to an experimental group of decompression and dynamic stabilization with Isobar system(n=16) and a control group of traditional interbody fusion(n=16).Visual analogue scale(VAS) and the Oswestry disability index(ODI) were used to assess clinical outcome preoperatively and postoperatively.The outcomes,operative time,blood loss and complications were analyzed and compared.Fexion or extension reontgenographs were taken before surgery and at the final follow-up.Range of motion(ROM) was assessed at the cranial/caudal adjacent levels(L3/L4and L5/S1) and at the lumbar spine from L2-S1.Results All cases were followed up for 15.8 months averagely,ranging from 6 to 24 months.Compared with that of preoperative,the general condition was improved,and their VAS scores and ODI were significantly reduced postoperatively during the whole period of follow-up(P<0.01).No difference was found in operation time and blood loss between the 2 groups(P>0.05).No complication related to internal fixation was observed.There was no significant difference in the ROM of the adjacent level ROM(L3/L4and L5/S1)before and after operation(P>0.05).In control group,the ROM of the lumbar spine(L2-S1) was significantly reduced postoperatively(P<0.05).And in experimental group the ROM of the lumbar spine(L2-S1) was increased postoperatively,but the different had no statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusion Both lumbar interbody fusion and dynamic stabilization system(the Isobar system) demonstrate satisfactory outcoms in treatment of degenerative lumbar disease.However,theoretically dynamic stabilization has higher risk of failure than lumbar interbody fusion.Therefore,the indications of dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar disease should be strictly chosen.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?