Abstract:In this paper, we address the issue of using logic rules to explain the results from legal case retrieval. The task is critical to legal case retrieval because the users (e.g., lawyers or judges) are highly specialized and require the system to provide logical, faithful, and interpretable explanations before making legal decisions. Recently, research efforts have been made to learn explainable legal case retrieval models. However, these methods usually select rationales (key sentences) from the legal cases as explanations, failing to provide faithful and logically correct explanations. In this paper, we propose Neural-Symbolic enhanced Legal Case Retrieval (NS-LCR), a framework that explicitly conducts reasoning on the matching of legal cases through learning case-level and law-level logic rules. The learned rules are then integrated into the retrieval process in a neuro-symbolic manner. Benefiting from the logic and interpretable nature of the logic rules, NS-LCR is equipped with built-in faithful explainability. We also show that NS-LCR is a model-agnostic framework that can be plugged in for multiple legal retrieval models. To showcase NS-LCR's superiority, we enhance existing benchmarks by adding manually annotated logic rules and introducing a novel explainability metric using Large Language Models (LLMs). Our comprehensive experiments reveal NS-LCR's effectiveness for ranking, alongside its proficiency in delivering reliable explanations for legal case retrieval.

On Logical Justification of Legal Rationality

On Logical Foundation of Legal Argument in Criminal Trial

On Second-Order Justification in Legal Reasoning

IRAC Method and Its Logical Justification

On Logical Analysis of Evaluating a Real Argument in Everyday Life

Explaining Non-monotonic Normative Reasoning using Argumentation Theory with Deontic Logic

Non-monotonic Reasoning and Argumentation System

Problems of Inconsistency and Argumentation Logics

Legal Logic Its Existence, Nature and Use

On Argument Evaluation from A Perspective of Informal Logic

Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective

A Semiotic Perspective on Logical Reasoning

An Argumentation-Based Legal Reasoning Approach for DL-Ontology

Arguments Grounded in Cases : A Computational Approach

AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes

Reasoning in Social Settings

Logic Rules as Explanations for Legal Case Retrieval

Value-based Practical Reasoning: Modal Logic + Argumentation

On Interdisciplinary Studies of a New Generation of Artificial Intelligence and Logic

On Non-formal Logic:Its Objects and Future Directions

Defeasible deontic logic: arguing about permission and obligation