Abstract:The validity of the priority vector used in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) relies on two factors: the selection of a numerical scale and the selection of a prioritization method. The traditional AHP selects only one numerical scale (e.g., the Saaty scale) and one prioritization method (e.g., the eigenvector method) for each particular problem. For this traditional selection approach, there is disagreement on which numerical scale and prioritization method is better in deriving a priority vector. In fact, the best numerical scale and the best prioritization method both rely on the content of the pairwise comparison data provided by the AHP decision makers. By defining a set of concepts regarding the scale function and the linguistic pairwise comparison matrices (LPCMs) of the priority vector and by using LPCMs to unify the format of the input and output of AHP, this paper extends the AHP prioritization process under the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic model. Based on the extended AHP prioritization process, we present two performance measure criteria to evaluate the effect of the numerical scales and prioritization methods. We also use the performance measure criteria to develop a 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic multicriteria approach to select the best numerical scales and the best prioritization methods for different LPCMs. In this paper, we call this type of selection the individual selection of the numerical scale and prioritization method. We also compare this individual selection with traditional selection by using both random and real data and show better results with individual selection.

Research on Ranking the Importance Weight of Customer Requirements Based on Monte Carlo-AHP

A Range Estimation on Priority Vectors in AHP

An Automatic Method to Reach Consensus in a Local Context for AHP Group Decision Making

A Semi-Fuzzy AHP Approach to Weigh the Customer Requirements in QFD for Customer-Oriented Product Design

A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment

Range Estimation Priority: A Method to Sift out Weak-weighted Criteria in AHP

A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP

Method of Weight Assignment for Multi-Criterion Based on Grey Interval AHP

The Weight Calculation, Consistency Test and Improvement Based on Singular Value Decomposition

Analytic Hierarchy Prioritization Process in the AHP Application Development: A Prioritization Operator Selection Approach

The Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on the Unascertained Three-Valued Judgments

Monte Carlo Simulation–Aided Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach: Case Study of Assessing Preferred Non-Point-Source Pollution Control Best Management Practices

A Study of Weight Coefficient Computing Method Based on AHP

Mapping verbal responses to numerical scales in the analytic hierarchy process

ON RANKING OF ALTERNATIVES IN UNCERTAIN GROUP DECISION MAKING MODEL

Ranking of Customer Requirements in a Competitive Environment.

Multiattribute Ranking Based on Analytic Hierarchy Model

Logistics Synthesis Evaluating on DEA/AHP Two-Stage Model

Selecting the Individual Numerical Scale and Prioritization Method in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Approach.

A new multi-criteria decision process to prioritise requirements

A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements