Abstract:Abstract Background The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is a 25-item measuring tool evaluating maladaptive personality traits for the diagnosis of personality disorders(PDs). As a promising scale, its impressive psychometric properties have been verified in some countries, however, there have been no studies about the utility of the PID-5-BF in Chinese settings. The current study aimed to explore the maladaptive personality factor model which was culturally adapted to China and to examine psychometric properties of the PID-5-BF among Chinese undergraduate students and clinical patients. Methods Seven thousand one hundred fifty-five undergraduate students and 451 clinical patients completed the Chinese version of the PID-5-BF. Two hundered twenty-eight students were chosen randomly for test-retest reliability at a 4-week interval. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to discover the most suitable factor structure in China, measurement invariance(MI), internal consistency, and external validity were also calculated. Results The theoretical five-factor model was acceptable, but the exploratory six-factor model was more applicable in both samples (Undergraduate sample: CFI = 0.905, TLI = 0.888, RMSEA = 0.044, SRMR = 0.039; Clinical sample: CFI = 0.904, TLI = 0.886, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.060). In the Chinese six-factor model, the Negative Affect domain was divided into two factors and the new factor was named “Interpersonal Relationships”, which was in line with the Big-Six Personality model in Chinese. Measurement invariance across non-clinical and clinical sample was established (configural, weak, strong MI, and partial strict MI). Aside from acceptable internal consistency (Undergraduate sample: alpha = 0.84, MIC = 0.21; Clinical sample: alpha = 0.86, MIC = 0.19) and test-retest reliability(0.73), the correlation between the 25-item PID-5-BF and the 220-item PID-5 was significant( p < 0.01). The six PDs measured by Personality diagnostic questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+) were associated with and predicted by expected domains of PID-5-BF. Conclusions Both the theoretical five-factor model and the exploratory six-factor model of the PID-5-BF were acceptable to the Chinese population. The five-factor model could allow for comparison and integration with other work on the original theoretical model. However, the Chinese six-factor structure may be more culturally informed in East Asian settings. In sum, the PID-5-BF is a convenient and useful screening tool for personality disorders.

The Reliability and Validity of Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ Used in Chinese College Students

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+: A Study with Chinese College Students

Chinese Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in A College Student Sample

Personality Disorders Detected by PDQ+4 in Under-Graduate Students

A Cross-Sectional Study of Personality Dysfunction among Students of First-Grade Senior High Schools in Beijing

Screening of Personality Disorders among Chinese College Students by Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+.

A Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese College Students' Personality Disorders

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form in undergraduate students and clinical patients

Relationships between attachment and personality disorder symptoms of chinese college students

A cross-sectional study of personality disorder in senior high school students in Beijing

Reliability and Validity of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire in Chinese College Students

Personality Disorders Detected by Personality Diagnosis Questionare in Patients of Psychotherapy Wards

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Revised Defensive Pessimism Questionnaire(Social)

The Hierarchical Structure and Predictive Validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Chinese Nonclinical Adolescents

Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

The Hierarchical Structure and Predictive Validity of the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> in Chinese Nonclinical Adolescents

Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model

Initial revision of Penn State Worry Questionnaire in Chinese college students

Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Cognitive Style Questionnaire in college students

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Swedish Universities Scales of Personality

Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in China: Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Trait Structure and Continuity With Personality Disorder Types