Clinical Comparison and Artificial Disc Replacement and Artificial Nucleus Replacement in the Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disk Herniation

Wu Bang-yao,Luo Zhuo-jing,Li Chang-jun,Liu Ye,Zhou Xu-xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-3826.2005.06.017
2006-01-01
Abstract:【Objective】To explore the clinical value of artificial disc replacement and artificial nucleus replacement in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.【Methods】The out comes were compared in 12 patients treated with artificial disc replacement and 28 patients with artificial nucleus replacement from August 2000 to July 2005.【Results】12 patients treated with artificial disc replacement were followed up with an average of 17.5 m(6~30 months).The clinical outcomes were excellent in 9 cases,good in 2 cases and fair in 1 case.28 patients treated with artificial nucleus replacement were followed up with an average of 12 months(4~18 months).The clinical outcomes were excellent in 19 cases,good in 5 cases and fair in 2 cases.And the migration of the prosthesis was found in 2 patient whose clinical symptoms recurred 1 month later after surgery and a second operation was done to remove it.【Conclusion】Both artificial disc replacement and artificial nucleus replacement can restore the intervertebral height and acquire a satisfactory short-term clinical result.But the latter is more acceptable by the surgeons and patients for its easier operation,less damage and cost.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?