Clinical Comparison of 2 Different Replacement Treatments of Lumbar Disc Herniation

吴邦耀,罗卓荆,李长军,刘业,周续祥
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2006.04.015
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore different clinical values of artificial disc replacement and artificial nucleus replacement in treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods The two different replacements were performed respectively in 40 patients with lumbar disc herniation.Results Twelve patients treated with artificial disc replacement were followed up with an average of 17.5 months(6-30 months).The clinical outcomes were excellent in 9 cases,good in 2 case,fair in 1 cases.Twenty-eight patients treated with artificial nucleus replacement were followed up with an average of 12 months(4-18months).The clinical outcomes were excellent in 19 cases,good in 5 cases,fair in 2 cases,and the migration of the prosthesis was found in the rest 2 patient,which recurred 1 months after operation and the prosthesis was surgically removed.Conclusion Both artificial disc replacement and artificial nucleus replacement can restore the intervertebral height,and acquire satisfactory short-term clinical result.Compared the two replacements,the latter is more acceptable by the surgeons and patients for its easier operation,less damage and cost.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?