What determines Earnings Discrepancy: Accounting standards or professional judgment? ——Preliminary evidence from China's A and B Share reporting

Liu Feng,Bing WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2006.03.005
2006-01-01
Abstract:There are quite a few firms issuing both A shares and B shares and traded in domestic capital market, or A share market, and restricted market, or B share market simultaneously. According to the requirement, these firms have to prepare two set of annual reports under Chinese Accounting Standards (CAS) and International Accounting Standards (IAS) respectively. It is widely accepted that the standards difference is minimum during 1998 - 2000 so we examine the reporting earnings discrepancy between the given period. Our empirical evidence shows that it is the professional judgments, instead of accounting standards, which drove the reporting earnings discrepancy between A share reporting and B share reporting. We further analyze the incentive for management to make the biased judgment. This paper support the conjecture raised by Ball (1995 ) that international accounting standards does not necessarily improve accounting information quality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?