Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol for Intravenous Anesthesia on Trigeminocardiac Reflex in Percutaneous Balloon Compression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
DongJu Long,Kai Chen,YaXi Li,PeiYao He,XinNing Li,XiuNan Qin,YaPing Wang,YanYing Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s473700
IF: 4.3188
2024-11-20
Drug Design Development and Therapy
Abstract:DongJu Long, 1 Kai Chen, 1 YaXi Li, 1 PeiYao He, 1 XinNing Li, 1, 2 XiuNan Qin, 1 YaPing Wang, 1, 2 YanYing Xiao 1, 2 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Pain Management, Clinical Research Center for Pain Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China Correspondence: YanYing Xiao, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-13467609491, Fax +86-731-85292115, Email Background: Trigeminal neuralgia usually presents as incapacitating facial pain. Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) is frequently utilized to manage this ailment. Trigeminocardiac reflex (TCR) commonly presents with sudden severe bradycardia or even asystole, alongside a sudden increase in blood pressure during this surgical procedure. Notably, remimazolam has been reported to maintain higher heart rate (HR) levels during anesthesia than propofol. Thus, this study aims to assess the impact of remimazolam anesthesia versus propofol on TCR occurrence during this procedure. Methods: This randomized controlled trial involved patients with trigeminal neuralgia scheduled for elective PBC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam or propofol for anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of TCR, a potential complication during the procedure. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of severe TCR, usage of atropine, HR at the time of foramen ovale puncture (T4), HR at the time of trigeminal ganglion compression (T5), and any adverse events. Results: A total of 80 patients were included in the study, with 40 patients in each group. The incidence of TCR was significantly lower in the remimazolam group compared to the propofol group (30.0% vs 82.5%; risk difference − 52.5%, 95% CI − 67.3% to − 18.6%; P < 0.001). The remimazolam group also showed a lower incidence of severe TCR (7.5% vs 45.0%) and significantly lower usage of atropine compared to the propofol group ( P < 0.001). Furthermore, HR at T4 and T5 were higher in the remimazolam than in the propofol group ( P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion: In PBC surgery for trigeminal neuralgia, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia showed a higher HR and a lower incidence of TCR than propofol without any increased adverse events. Keywords: remimazolam, propofol, trigeminal neuralgia, balloon occlusion, methods, reflex, trigeminocardiac, hemodynamics Trigeminal neuralgia is a chronic neuropathic pain condition that causes spontaneous and provoked episodes of electric shock-like or stabbing pain in the facial areas. 1,2 Severe cases of trigeminal neuralgia even have been associated with a diminished quality of life and an increased risk of suicide. 1,3 Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of the trigeminal ganglion has become a well-recognized technique for severe trigeminal neuralgia. 4 Significant hemodynamic fluctuations are often observed during the PBC procedure, resulting in a sudden severe bradycardia or even asystole and a sudden increase in blood pressure, known as the trigeminocardiac reflex (TCR). 5,6 Unfortunately, this can lead to disastrous cardiovascular complications and become life-threatening. Meuwly et al 5 proposed that TCR was defined as a sudden and dramatic change in heart rate (HR), with or without accompanying changes in blood pressure, which indicated that HR fluctuation (bradycardia) is a more important variable than changes in blood pressure during the TCR. Prophylactic administration of atropine was suggested to prevent or reduce TCR-related tachycardia, 7 while nitroprusside was used to prevent TCR-related hypertension. 8 Additionally, the combination of nitroprusside and atropine was also employed for TCR pretreatment. 9 Although atropine reduced the incidence of bradycardia, it was associated with potential side effects such as increased blood pressure, arrhythmias, elevated intraocular pressure, and delirium. 6 Moreover, the unpredictability of certain TCR types and the uncertainty regarding the timing of prophylactic administration contribute to the ongoing debate over the atropine-related prevention of TCR. 10 Although various methods to prevent TCR have been explored, such as trigeminal ganglion block, 11 deep anesthesia, 12 usi -Abstract Truncated-
pharmacology & pharmacy,chemistry, medicinal