The Different Processing Mechanisms of Three English Verbal Inflections for Chinese Native Speakers
Ma Tengfei,Ou Bangfei,Chen Baoguo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2013.02.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:Inflectional morphology is the modification of a word to indicate tense,number,person,or comparison(e.g.,slow-slowest) without altering the meaning of words.Compared to native English speakers,it is difficult for second language learners to process inflected words even when they study abroad for many years.Previous studies suggested that the processing of inflections involved two different memory systems:declarative memory system for storing word knowledge and procedural memory system for processing syntax and rules.For late second language learners,they rely more on declarative memory system to process inflections.However,we did not know whether inflections'processing will turn into procedural processing,and what kind of rules or inflections can be processed by procedural memory system.According to Ullman(2004),ERP components can reflect the mechanism of inflection processing.Therefore, in the present study,we adopted ERP technique to examine Chinese learners'processing of English verbal inflections(the inflection of verb progressive tenses,-ing,the inflection of regular verb perfect tenses,-ed,and the inflection of irregular verb perfect tenses). In the present experiment,sixteen Chinese students who learn English as a second language participated in the experiment.They completed a grammatical judgment task,and ERPs were recorded by NeuroScan system at the same time.The materials contain 408 sentences,with 48 sentences per condition(grammatical/ungrammatical sentences with -ing,grammatical/ungrammatical sentences with -ed,grammatical/ungrammatical sentences with irregular verb inflections in perfect tense). Behavioral results showed that,the processing performance of -ing were better than that of the other two inflections.ERP results showed that,the violation of -ing caused the P600 component,the violation of -ed caused the N400 component,while the violation of irregular verb perfect tenses did not produce any significant ERP components. Based on these findings,we conclude that the same processing mechanism is not shared by processing of the inflection of verb progressive tenses,the inflection of regular verb perfect tenses,and the inflection of irregular verb perfect tenses that have no obvious affix. The difference across English verbal inflections may be related to the complexity of inflectional rules.