Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with JASPER electrolytically detachable coils: a clinical observation

Wan Jieqing,Fan Yiling,Pan Yaohua,Jiang Jiyao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7061.2012.04.001
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effectiveness of the JASPER electrolytically detachable coil and Platinum coil system for embolization of intracranial aneurysms.Methods Sixty-two patients with intracranial aneurysms were treated by JASPER coils(30 patients,the JASPER group) or by MicroVention coils(32 patients,the control group) for the embolization of aneurysms.All procedures were operated by the same surgeon with same type of microcatheter.The visibility of both coils,easiness of deployment through microcatheter,uncoiling,flexibility,effect of forming a basket,dense packing,and the time needed for detachment were observed under the fluoroscopy during the procedures.The patients were followed up by telephone,outpatient appointment,and angiography.Results A total of 95 JASPER coils and 108 MicroVention coils were used.Friction was observed(8/95) in the JASPER group during pushing of the microcatheter,while none was found in the control group.5 coils in the JASPER group and 1 coil in the control group were stretched during the repositioning.Electrolytically detaching time was more than 45 s in the JASPER group but only 1 s in the control group.There was no significant difference between two groups in the percentages of densely packed,neck remnant,and incompletely packed aneurysm.All patients were followed up from 3 to 22 months(mean 7 months),and no rebleeding happened.48 patients were followed up with digital subtraction angiography(DSA),and each group had one recurrence of aneurysm.Conclusion It is safe and effective for treating intracranial aneurysm by JASPER coil.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?