Issues with the Use of Fly Ash for Carbon Sequestration

A. V. Palumbo,L. S. Fisher,J. R. Tarver,W. L. Daniels,Z. Yang,S. M. Tiquia,L. Wu,J. Z. Zhou,J. E. Amonette
2003-01-01
Abstract:As part of a study of the potential for carbon sequestration in degraded mine lands, we have found that based on laboratory and field experiments, fly ash and biosolid amendments can increase soil carbon. Although it appears that geochemistry plays a large part in this effect, it is not clear if there is also an effect on the microbial community and its influence on carbon sequestration. Also, addition of fly ash to soil, while generally considered safe, does cause some concern to the public. Nitrogen is an additional concern due to the potential release of nitrous oxide from microbial activity following the addition of biosolids. We examined the relationships among some aspects of the nitrogen cycling, carbon content, and microbial community structure in reclaimed mine soils. Using a variety of molecular approaches, we were able to detect large differences in microbial communities among the sites. We have started to apply an oligonucleotide-based array on the soil samples to examine genes involved in nitrogen cycling. Experiments with fly ash from several sources mixed with soil have shown diminemus amounts of toxic metals in column leachate studies. Assays of toxicity with the leachates conducted using the Microtox system have been negative for all samples tested. Thus, it appears that fly ash amendments would have little potential for toxic effects, that there is potential to further reduce metals in leachates with other amendments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?