Postsocialism? Reflections on “socialism with Chinese characteristics”
Arif Dirlik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.1989.10413190
1989-03-01
Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars
Abstract:In the discussion below, I consider the interpretive possibilities of a conceptualization of Chinese socialism that is primarily deconstructive in intention, although it may also provide an occasion for a new reading of the meaning of socialism in our day. My immediate goal is to find a way out of the conceptual prison into which Chinese socialism is forced by ideological efforts to constrict it between received notions of capitalism and socialism. Chinese society today is the subject of radical transformation, which is expressed at the level of ideology by an intense struggle between two discourses that seek to appropriate its future for two alternative visions of history. These discourses, I will argue here, are both irredeemably ideological or, viewed from an alternative perspective, utopian. Chinese socialism justifies itself in terms of a historical vision that has no apparent relevance to the present. This renders it vulnerable to negation at the hands of a discourse embedded in the history of capitalism that strives to colonize the future for its own historical vision. In the process both discourses impose upon the insistently ambiguous evidence of contemporary Chinese socialism interpretive readings that may be sustained only by ignoring evidence contrary to their historical presumptions. Stated bluntly, any representation of China's present historical path as capitalist is not just descriptive but also prescriptive: in other words, such representation is intended to shape the reality that it innocently pretends to describe. The counterinsistence that China is a socialist society headed for communism, on the other hand, uses theoretical conventions to cover up a social situation that distorts socialism out of recognizable form. In his illuminating study, Class Conflict in Chinese Socialism, Richard Kraus has observed that “class analysis . . . is an aspect of the class conflict it is intended to comprehend.” Much the same may be said of the question of socialism in China, which in the affirmation or negation of the relevance to China's future of a socialist vision is part of an ongoing struggle over the future of socialism in Chinese society— and, by extension, globally—in which the major casualty is the concept of socialism itself. The conceptualization I offer here is necessitated by a recognition that to represent presentday Chinese socialism in terms of one or the other of these categories is inevitably to become party to ideological activity that suppresses the most fundamental problems presented to existing ideas of socialism and capitalism by the momentous changes in Chinese society.