Why Can Breast Carcinoma Be Missed and How to Avoid

LI Lan,MEI Ang,HUA Jia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9011.2011.03.014
2011-01-01
Journal of Medical Imaging
Abstract:Objective:The aim of this study is to investigate the factors hindering early breast cancer detection and to outline the major guidelines to overcome these factors aiming to an optimum mammographic examination and interpretation by radiologists.Methods:We included 52 histopathologically proven breast carcinomas that were initially missed on mammography.The cases were subjected to mammography,complementary US,MRI and digital mammography in some cases and all cases were histopathologically proven either by FNAB,CNB or open biopsy.Results:Revision of the pathological specimens of these 52 cases revealed 36 infiltrating ductal carcinomas,2 lobular,4 mucinous,4 inflammatory carcinomas,3 carcinomas in situ,2 intraductal papillary carcinomas and 1 case with Paget disease of the nipple.In analyzing the causes responsible for misdiagnosis of these carcinomas we classified them into 4 causative factors;patient,tumor,technical or provider factors.Tumor factors were the most commonly encountered,accounting for 44.2%,while provider factors were the least commonly encountered in 15.3%.32 carcinomas were detected on double and re-reading by more experienced radiologists.Additional mammographic views were recommended in 11 cases.Complementary MRI examination was performed for all 52 cases(100%) and showed a higher sensitivity than mammography in carcinoma detection.Conclusion:Four main factors are responsible for missing a carcinoma: ① Patient factors(inherently dense breasts or acquired dense breasts);② Tumor factors(subtle carcinoma,masked carcinoma,multifocal carcinoma and multicentric carcinoma);③ Technical factors(bad exposure factors,malpositioned breasts and bad processing quality);④ Provider factors(bad perception and misinterpretation).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?