First Evidence of Ψ(2 S ) → Ω − +

M. Ablikim,J. Z. Bai,Y. Bai,Y. Ban,X. Cai,H. F. Chen,H. S. Chen,J. C. Chen,J. Chen,Y. B. Chen,Y. P. Chu,Y. S. Dai,Z. Y. Deng,S. X. Du,J. Fang,C. D. Fu,Y. Gao,Y. T. Gu,Z. J. Guo,F. A. Harris,K. L. He,M. He,Y. K. Heng,H. M. Hu,T. Hussain,T. Hu,G. S. Huang,X. T. Huang,Y. P. Huang,X. B. Ji,X. S. Jiang,J. B. Jiao,D. P. Jin,S. Jin,G. Li,H. B. Li,J. Li,L. Li,R. Y. Li,W. D. Li,W. G. Li,X. L. Li,X. N. Li,X. Q. Li,Y. F. Liang,B. J. Liu,C. X. Liu,Fang Liu,Feng Liu,H. B. Liu,H. M. Liu,J. P. Liu,Q. Liu,R. G. Liu,Z. A. Liu,F. Lu,G. R. Lu,J. G. Lu,X. L. Luo,F. C. Ma,H. L. Ma,Q. M. Ma,M. Q. A. Malik,Z. P. Mao,X. H. Mo,J. Nie,S. L. Olsen,R. G. Ping,J. F. Qiu,G. Rong,X. D. Ruan,L. Y. Shan,L. Shang,C. P. Shen,X. Y. Shen,H. Y. Sheng,S. S. Sun,Y. Z. Sun,Z. J. Sun,X. Tang,J. P. Tian,G. S. Varner,X. Wan,L. Wang,L. L. Wang,L. S. Wang,P. Wang,P. L. Wang,Y. F. Wang,Z. Wang,Z. Y. Wang,C. L. Wei,D. H. Wei,N. Wu,G. F. Xu,X. P. Xu,Y. Xu,M. L. Yan,H. X. Yang,M. Yang,Y. X. Yang,M. H. Ye,Y. X. Ye,C. X. Yu,C. Z. Yuan,Y. Yuan,Y. Zeng,B. X. Zhang,B. Y. Zhang,C. C. Zhang,D. H. Zhang,H. Q. Zhang,H. Y. Zhang,J. W. Zhang,J. Y. Zhang,X. Y. Zhang,Y. Y. Zhang,Z. P. Zhang,J. W. Zhao,M. G. Zhao,P. P. Zhao,Z. G. Zhao,B. Zheng,H. Q. Zheng,J. P. Zheng,Z. P. Zheng,B. Zhong,L. Zhou,K. J. Zhu,Q. M. Zhu,X. W. Zhu,Y. S. Zhu,Z. A. Zhu,B. S. Zou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/36/11/002
IF: 2.944
2012-01-01
Chinese Physics C
Abstract:The decay ψ(2S) → Ω−+ is analyzed using 14 × 106 ψ(2S) events recorded by the Beijing Spectrometer II (BES II) at the Beijing Electron Positron Collider (BEPC). Based upon events with no missing charged tracks and a satisfactory four-constraint kinematic fit, we determine the upper limit for the branching fraction of ψ(2S) → Ω−+ to be 1.5 × 10−4 at a 90% confidence level. By including events with one missing charged track, we are able to report the first evidence of an Ω−+ signal with a statistical significance of 3.1σ. The branching fraction of ψ(2S) → Ω−+ is determined to be (4.80±1.56(stat)±1.30(sys)) × 10−5.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?