Evidence Of Sigma Particle In J/Psi ->Omega Pi(+)Pi(-) Decay

JZ Bai,Y Ban,JG Bian,X Cai,JF Chang,HX Chen,HS Chen,HF Chen,JC Chen,J Chen,ML Chen,YB Chen,SP Chi,YP Chu,XZ Cui,HL Dai,YS Dai,ZY Deng,SX Du,ZZ Du,J Fang,SS Fang,CD Fu,HY Fu,LP Fu,CS Gao,ML Gao,YN Gao,MY Gong,WX Gong,SD Gu,YN Guo,YQ Guo,SW Han,J He,KL He,M He,X He,YK Heng,HM Hu,T Hu,GS Huang,L Huang,XP Huang,QY Jia,XB Ji,CH Jiang,XS Jiang,DP Jin,S Jin,Y Jin,YF Lai,F Li,G Li,HH Li,JC Li,J Li,QJ Li,RY Li,RB Li,SM Li,W Li,WG Li,XL Li,XQ Li,XS Li,YF Liang,HB Liao,CX Liu,F Liu,HM Liu,JB Liu,JP Liu,RG Liu,Y Liu,ZA Liu,ZX Liu,GR Lu,F Lu,JG Lu,CL Luo,XL Luo,FC Ma,JM Ma,LL Ma,XY Ma,ZP Mao,XC Meng,XH Mo,J Nie,ZD Nie,HP Peng,ND Qi,CD Qian,H Qin,JF Qiu,ZY Ren,G Rong,TN Ruan,LY Shan,L Shang,DL Shen,XY Shen,HY Sheng,F Shi,X Shi,LW Song,HS Sun,SS Sun,YZ Sun,ZJ Sun,X Tang,N Tao,YR Tian,GL Tong,DY Wang,JZ Wang,L Wang,LS Wang,M Wang,PL Wang,P Wang,SZ Wang,WF Wang,YF Wang,Z Wang,ZY Wang,CL Wei,N Wu,YM Wu,XM Xia,XX Xie,B Xin,GF Xu,H Xu,Y Xu,ST Xue,ML Yan,WB Yan,F Yang,HX Yang,J Yang,SD Yang,YX Yang,LH Yi,ZY Yi,M Ye,MH Ye,YX Ye,CS Yu,GW Yu,JM Yuan,Y Yuan,Q Yue,SL Zang,Y Zeng,BX Zhang,BY Zhang,CC Zhang,DH Zhang,HY Zhang,JW Zhang,J Zhang,JY Zhang,JM Zhang,LS Zhang,QJ Zhang,SQ Zhang,XM Zhang,XY Zhang,YY Zhang,YJ Zhang,YY Zhang,ZQ Zhang,ZP Zhang,DX Zhao,JB Zhao,JW Zhao,PP Zhao,WR Zhao,XJ Zhao,YB Zhao,HQ Zheng,JP Zheng,LS Zheng,ZP Zheng,XC Zhong,BQ Zhou,GM Zhou,L Zhou,NF Zhou,KJ Zhu,QM Zhu,YC Zhu,YS Zhu,YC Zhu,ZA Zhu,BA Zhuang
2004-01-01
Abstract:Based on a sample of 7.8 x 10(6) BESI J/psi events, the decay of J/psi -wpi(+) pi (-) is studied. A low mass enhancement in the pi(+) pi(-) invariant mass spectrum recoiling against omega particle is clearly seen which does not come from the phase space effect and the background. According to PWA analysis, this low mass enhancement is a broad 0(++) resonance, the sigma particle. If a Baeit-Winger function of constant width is used to fit the sigma signal, its mass and width are 384 +/- 66 MeV and 458 +/- 100 MeV respectively, which correspond to the pole position at (434 +/- 78)-i(202 +/- 43) MeV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?