Abstract:China adopted the explicit deposit insurance scheme (DIS) on May 1, 2015. The adoption of the explicit DIS is an important step allowing the Chinese government to forestall systemic financial risks. It is worth noting that the governments of countries that adopted the explicit DIS earlier, such as the U. S., provided little implicit protection for their banking sector. In contrast, the Chinese government offered implicit blanket deposit insurance for banks prior to its implementation of the explicit DIS because of the systematic importance of the banking sector to China's real economy.Therefore, it is difficult for China to learn from the experiences of developed countries such as the U. S..For countries like China, of which the governments offered an implicit blanket guarantee to both gigantic state-owned commercial banks and small rural and urban credit unions, the adoption of the explicit DIS has not only a direct impact on the banking sector, but also a spillover effect on other parts of the financial system. After the adoption of the explicit DIS, the government no longer has the responsibility for providing full financial support to banks, and bank exits become possible. Therefore, the direct effect of the explicit DIS on the stability of China's banking sector is likely to be negative.However, the total fiscal position will likely not deteriorate as much as it did during earlier episodes. Therefore, the"spillover effect"of the explicit DIS on the entire financial system could be positive.This paper focuses on the countries that adopted the explicit DIS after the 1970 s, which are similar to China. Based on data from 57 countries between 1970 and 2009, we investigate the impact of the explicit DIS on different types of financial crises. The results show that the explicit DIS increases the likelihood of bank exits but decreases the probability of other financial crises. The results are robust to the use of 2 SLS regressions, an alternative definition of different types of financial crises, additional controls for global financial crises and different subsamples. We argue that the transition from implicit blanket deposit insurance to explicit DIS decreases protection for the banking sector but alleviates the burden on the government and other parts of the financial system.Considering the recent heated policy discussions in China regarding China's Deposit Insurance Act, we further analyze the effects of three important design features on different types of financial crises. These features are the risk-adjusted premium, making banks the sole funding source and establishing an independent DIS agency. We find that the optimal design feature for the stability of the banking sector may not be the optimal one for the stability of the whole financial system. The results indicate that the risk-adjusted premium increases the likelihood of other financial crises but has no effect on the likelihood of banking crises. Making banks the sole funding source plays no relevant role in the rest of the financial system, but increases the likelihood of banking crises. An independent DIS agency increases the likelihood of both banking crises and other financial crises. Given these findings, we propose the government pay more attention to the impact of the risk-adjusted premium on other financial sectors, inject more money into the DIS agency and keep the DIS agency subordinate to the People's Bank of China.Our work contributes to the existing literature in the following ways. First, we examine the impact of the explicit DIS on both the banking sector and other financial sectors, providing a more comprehensive landscape of the field. Second, given that the Chinese government provided an implicit DIS prior to the adoption of the explicit DIS, we take the existence of an implicit DIS into consideration and offer an alternative explanation of the impacts of the explicit DIS on different types of financial crises. Third, we analyze the effects of three important DIS design features on financial crises, including the risk-adjusted premium, the funding source and the independence of the DIS agency. The government should consider the potential effects on other financial sectors when designing the explicit DIS.

A Pilot Study on the Size of Deposit Insurance Fund in China

An Analysis on the Relationship between Deposit Insurance and Central Bank's LLR

A Comparative Study of the Two Fundamental Deposit Insurance Rmodels

Deposits Insurance Pricing Based on Bank's Capital Allocation

An Empirical Analysis on Depositors' Market Discipline to China's Commercial Banks

The Impact of a Pilot Reform on the Diagnosis-Related-groups Payment System in China: a Difference-in-difference Study

Deposit Insurance and Its Prospects in China

Implicit Deposit Insurance, Explicit Deposit Insurance and Financial Stability: Cross-country Evidence and Implications for China's Deposit Insurance Arrangements

The Part Deposit Insurance and the Market Discipline of Chinese Banking

An Empirical Study of Local Corporate Financial Institutions Deposit Insurance Pricing:Based on the Pricing Model with Expected Loss

Game Analysis of Deposit Insurance System In Nongovernmental Bank

Some Thinking on Structuring the Deposit Insurance System of Our Country

Pricing the Deposit Insurance under the Regulatory Forbearance

On the Commercial Bank's Liability Structure and Its Impact on Deposit Insurance Pricing

Sensitivity Analysis of China's Rural Social Endowment Insurance and Simulation of Limited Financial Resposiblity Input

The Impact of Uninsured Deposit Rate on the Deposit Insurance Pricing

"Size Preference"and Dissimilation of Bank's Market Discipline

Deposit Insurance and Bank Liquidity Creation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China*

Deposit Inbalance: Theoretical Analyses and Empirical Test from the Macro-financial Perspective

A Overview of the Theoretical Literature of the Bank Capital Regulation

Internet Finance Development and Banking Market Discipline: Evidence from China