Comparison of DPOAE with the combination of DPOAE and AABR in the application of newborn hearing screening

XU Zheng-min,ZHAO Xin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2007.04.005
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective This paper was to compare distortion product otoacoustic emissions(DPOAE)with the combination of DPOAE and automatic auditory brainstem response(AABR)in the application of newborn hearing screening Methods DPOAE and the combined DPOAE/AABR were administered to 200 newborns with 400 ears between 3 and 24 days after birth.Screening was conducted to identify neonates at risk of hearing impairment in neonatal intensive care unit(NICU)of Shanghai Children's Medical Center of Fudan University.Results In the initial hearing screen,a total of 29 babies(14.5%)were referred for only DPOAE testing,while 9 babies(4.5%)for both DPOAE and AABR.The follow-up diagnostic battery,consisting of otologic examination,acoustic impedance,and diagnostic ABR(DABR),had confirmed that six babies/11 ears(3%)had sensorineural hearing losses 2 months after birth.The combined DPOAE/ AABR demonstrated greater sensitivity of 98.5% in screening high risk babies and could minimize false positive in the initial test.The spectral frequency analysis found that the pass rates of DPOAE at high frequencies were high(2562 Hz,93% and 3187 Hz,88%)for 23 ears that passed AABR(click stimulation). For 15 ears that failed AABR test,the pass rates(%)of DPOAE at low frequencies(500,1000 and 1593 Hz) were a slightly higher than that at high frequencies(2562 Hz,3187Hz and 4031 Hz).Conclusion The data suggested the combination of DPOAE and AABR technique could be applied to neonates.Because of the high sensitivity,false positives can be reduced and could provide frequency-specific information as a targeted neonatal hearing screening.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?