Abstract:Background: Extracting high-quality total RNA is pivotal for advanced RNA molecular studies, such as Next-generation sequencing and expression microarrays where RNA is hybridized. Despite the development of numerous extraction methods in recent decades, like the cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and the traditional TRIzol reagent methods, their complexity and high costs often impede their application in small-scale laboratories. Therefore, a practical and economical method for RNA extraction that maintains high standards of efficiency and quality needs to be provided to optimize RNA extraction from human and mice tissues. Method: This study proposes enhancements to the TRIzol method by incorporating guanidine isothiocyanate (GITC-T method) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS-T method). We evaluated the effectiveness of these modified methods compared to the TRIzol method using a micro-volume UV-visible spectrophotometer, electrophoresis, q-PCR, RNA-Seq, and whole transcriptome sequencing. Result: The micro-volume UV-visible spectrophotometer, electrophoresis, and RNA-Seq demonstrated that the GITC-T method yielded RNA with higher yields, integrity, and purity, while the consistency in RNA quality between the two methods was confirmed. Taking mouse cerebral cortex tissue as a sample, the yield of total RNA extracted by the GITC-T method was 1,959.06 ± 49.68 ng/mg, while the yield of total RNA extracted by the TRIzol method was 1,673.08 ± 86.39 ng/mg. At the same time, the OD260/280 of the total RNA samples extracted by the GITC-T method was 2.03 ± 0.012, and the OD260/230 was 2.17 ± 0.031, while the OD260/280 of the total RNA samples extracted by the TRIzol method was 2.013 ± 0.041 and the OD260/230 was 2.11 ± 0.062. Furthermore, q-PCR indicated that the GITC-T method achieved higher yields, purity, and greater transcript abundance of total RNA from the same types of animal samples than the TRIzol method. Conclusion: The GITC-T method not only yields higher purity and quantity of RNA but also reduces reagent consumption and overall costs, thereby presenting a more feasible option for small-scale laboratory settings.

Comparison of three different methods for total RNA isolation from mouse heart tissue

Isolation Methods of Different Tissue Total RNA from Kunming Mice

Comparison of Methods for Total RNA Extraction from Apple Tissues

Preparation of a Non-Cardiomyocyte Cell Suspension for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing from a Post-Myocardial Infarction Adult Mouse Heart

Optimizing total RNA extraction method for human and mice samples

A Method for Isolation of High Quality RNA from Various Juglans Regia Tissues

Methods of mouse cardiomyocyte isolation from postnatal heart

Comparison of isolation methods of exosomes and exosomal RNA from cell culture medium and serum

Extraction of total RNA from white tea and non-green tissues in Camellia sinensis

Comparison of Rna Extraction Methods Applied to Gene Cloning of the Taxol-Producing Fungi

Comparison of Different Methods for Extraction of DNA from Paraffin-Embedded Tissues

Isolation and purification of murine hepatic non-parenchymal cells by liver circulatory perfusion in situ

Effect of One-Step 100% Ethanol Fixation and Modified Manual Microdissection on High-Quality Rna Recovery from Esophageal Carcinoma Specimen

Microcapsule-broken Method Suitable for RNA Isolation from Alginate-Chitosan Encapsulated Hepatocytes

Comparison of Two Different Methods for Purification of Rat Islets

Visualization of Mouse Cardiac Microvascular Blood Flow and Distribution of Serum Protein with in Vivo Cryotechnique

Importance of RNA isolation methods for analysis of exosomal RNA: evaluation of different methods

A comparison of five methods to maximize RNA and DNA isolation yield from adipose tissue

One improved method for the extraction of total RNA from rat bone

Comparison of Fecal MicroRNA Isolation Using Various Total RNA Isolation Kits

A Simple and High Quality Method for Isolation and Extraction of Total RNA of Pholiota Adipose