Abstract:BackgroundSelected microRNAs (miRNAs) that are abnormally expressed in the serum of patients with lung cancer have recently been proposed as biomarkers of this disease. The measurement of circulating miRNAs, however, requires a highly reliable quantification method. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is the most commonly used method, but it lacks reliable endogenous reference miRNAs for normalization of results in biofluids. When used in absolute quantification, it must rely on the use of external calibrators. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a recently introduced technology that overcomes the normalization issue and may facilitate miRNA measurement. Here we compared the performance of absolute qPCR and ddPCR techniques for quantifying selected miRNAs in the serum.ResultsIn the first experiment, three miRNAs, proposed in the literature as lung cancer biomarkers (miR-21, miR-126 and let-7a), were analyzed in a set of 15 human serum samples. Four independent qPCR and four independent ddPCR amplifications were done on the same samples and used to estimate the precision and correlation of miRNA measurements obtained with the two techniques. The precision of the two methods was evaluated by calculating the Coefficient of Variation (CV) of the four independent measurements obtained with each technique. The CV was similar or smaller in ddPCR than in qPCR for all miRNAs tested, and was significantly smaller for let-7a (p = 0.028). Linear regression analysis of the miRNA values obtained with qPCR and ddPCR showed strong correlation (p < 0.001).To validate the correlation obtained with the two techniques in the first experiment, in a second experiment the same miRNAs were measured in a larger cohort (70 human serum samples) by both qPCR and ddPCR. The correlation of miRNA analyses with the two methods was significant for all three miRNAs. Moreover, in our experiments the ddPCR technique had higher throughput than qPCR, at a similar cost-per-sample.ConclusionsAnalyses of serum miRNAs performed with qPCR and ddPCR were largely concordant. Both qPCR and ddPCR can reliably be used to quantify circulating miRNAs, however, ddPCR revealed similar or greater precision and higher throughput of analysis.

Comparison of Fecal MicroRNA Isolation Using Various Total RNA Isolation Kits

Comprehensive evaluation of extracellular small RNA isolation methods from serum in high throughput sequencing

Comparison of Commercial Exosome Isolation Kits for Circulating Exosomal Microrna Profiling

Factors Influencing Circulating MicroRNA Level in the Studies of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Biomarker.

Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids

Comparison of isolation methods of exosomes and exosomal RNA from cell culture medium and serum

Profiling small RNAs in fecal immunochemical tests: is it possible?

Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs

Identification of Mir-23A As a Novel Microrna Normalizer for Relative Quantification in Human Uterine Cervical Tissues

Initial Study of Microrna Expression Profiles of Colonic Cancer Without Lymph Node Metastasis.

Identification of Reference Genes for Circulating Microrna Analysis in Colorectal Cancer

Analysis of Circulating MicroRNA: Preanalytical and Analytical Challenges

A novel assay for exosomal and cell-free miRNA isolation and quantification

Fecal miR-29a and miR-224 as the noninvasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer.

Novel circulating microRNAs expression profile in colon cancer: a pilot study

Peer Review #2 of "comparison of Serum Exosome Isolation Methods on Co-Precipitated Free Micrornas (V0.1)"

A comparison between quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR technologies for circulating microRNA quantification in human lung cancer

A fecal miRNA signature by small RNA sequencing accurately distinguishes colorectal cancers: results from a multicentric study.

Comparative Studies of Two Methods for Mirna Isolation from Milk Whey.

Comparison of RNA extraction and microRNA detection protocols for a small amount of germinal vesicle oocytes in bovine.

Quantification of Small Non Coding RNAs May Allow Accurate Comparisons of MiRNA Expression Profiles from Plant Specimens