Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

The Impact of Labor Cost on Labor Productivity: Evidence from China's Provincial Panel Data

The incentive effect and a reasonable range of labor costs

Land Use Regulation, Land Reclamation, and Industrial Productivity: Evidence from China

Firm-Size Effect on Wages:Evidence from Chinese Competitive Labor Market

China's Unbalanced Economic Growth and National Income Distribution

Incentive Pay and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Do Rising Labour Costs Drive Innovation in Enterprises? Propensity Score Matching Evidence from Chinese Firms

Effect of the Rising Wages On China's Comparative Advantage

The Evolving Pattern of the Wage–labor Productivity Nexus in China: Evidence from Manufacturing Firm-Level Data

How Do Rising Labor Costs Affect Green Total Factor Productivity? Based on the Industrial Intelligence Perspective

Labor price distortion and export product markups: Evidence from China labor market

Labor cost, government intervention, and corporate innovation: Evidence from China

Trade Liberalisation and Labour Income Share Variation: an Interpretation of China’s Deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem

Relationship Between Wage and Labor Productivity：：pattern and Explanation

The Performance of Industrial Productivity Across Regions of China: Structural Differences, Institutional Shocks and Dynamic Characteristics

Technical Change,Average Profit Rate and Labor Productivity——An Empirical Study Based on Panel Data of 290 Cities in China from 2006 to 2020

Does government investment push up manufacturing labor costs? Evidence from China

Firm Response to Competitive Shocks: Evidence from China’s Minimum Wage Policy

The End of Cheap Chinese Labor

Does the increase of labor protection intensity promote regional economic growth? Evidence from China