Abstract:Steven Pinker presents four ideals of Enlightenment in his popular book Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. He argues his case brilliantly and convincingly through cogent arguments in a language comprehensible to the reader of the present century. Moreover, whether it is reason or science or humanism or progress, he defends his position powerfully. He justifies his views by citing 75 graphs on the upswing improvement made by humanity in terms of prosperity, longevity, education, equality of men and women, health, political freedom and medical breakthroughs. Though Pinker makes an excellent case for the positive contributions of Enlightenment; however he ignores the negative aspects that are responsible for causing a great schism between the white race and others who are black and brown. The paper highlights some of these negative comments made by such Enlightenment thinkers as Montesquieu, Voltaire, Chambers, Down and Down and others. Through their literary and scientific writings, these scholars and researchers downgraded the black and brown races, thus causing a rift that led to slavery, colonialism and apartheid. The paper reveals these negative aspects ignored by Pinker in his otherwise well-researched book on Enlightenment. Since Pinker presents a one-sided case by including only the positive contributions of Enlightenment, I recommend that he should write a sequel to his present work outlining the negative aspects responsible for numerous political, social and environmental problems facing humanity today. By using dialectical logic in place of logic of contraries, he might be able to synthesize both the positive and negative aspects of Enlightenment. He can then argue that humanity might be propelled to make progress more efficiently at a faster pace toward humanism and world peace.

Reviewing the Problem Awareness of Positivism from the Defects of Enlightenment Rationality

Enlightenment Reason and Modernity: Marx’s Critical Reconstruction

Reflections on the "Dialectics in Enlightenment" : A Review of Kant's "An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment"

The Entanglement of Psychologism and Logicism-To Review the Intellectual History of the Relevant Disputations between E. Husserl and W. Wundt

On the Ideal Rationality of the University

On the Blasphemy of Reason and Path of Criticism

A Critique of Modernity and 'Dialectec of Enlightenment'

Criticizing and Introspecting on Public School's "Bureaucracy Criticism"

The Debate on “problems And-Isms”: from the Philosophical Perspective

Enlightenment:Reason and Rationalism

The Third Sense of Enlightenment As Seen in Thecritique of the Power of Judgment

The Inner Tensity of the Enlightment

Appraisal of Steven Pinker’s Position on Enlightenment

Dilemma of Modernity and Reconstruction of Rationality

On Problem Awareness in Studies of Philosophy

Aesthetic Salvation for the Erosion of Rationality——Research of Frankfurt's Aesthetics Thought

A Review of the Rural Scholars' Viewpoints of the Education Reform in Late Qing Dynasty on the Basis of Liu Dapeng's Diary and Zhu Zhisan's Diary

Reiteration of Enlightenment——Walking Out of the Dialectics from Enlightenment to Concentration of Power

The Possibility of Rational Discussion in the Value Domain

Critique of Instrumental Rationality in View of Chinese Reality--Analysis Viewed from the Construction of System

The Thought and the Thinker Opening Knowledge——The First Part of Knowledge-Critique of Deng Zheng-lai