Comparison study of adhesion pathways and efficacy between P-selectin targeted ultrasound microbubbles and regular contrast microbubbles

JI Lijing,YANG Li,WU Juefei,HU Guangquan,XIE Jiajia,LI Junhua,YAN Yi,BIN Jianping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-6978.2009.05.001
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the adhesion pathways and efficacy of P-selectin targeted ultrasoundmicrobubbles and regular contrast microbubbles on the inflammatory endothelium by fluorescence microscope.Methods The targeted microbubbles with FITC fluorescence and monoclonal antibody of P-selectin(MBp)and the regular contrast microbubbles with FITC fluorescence(MB)were constructed.MBp and MB were intravenously injected to 10 wild-type mice with TNF-α stimulus and 10 wild-type mice without any treatment randomly.Then the adhesion number and adhesion condition in cremasteric venules in two groups within 5 min were observed and recorded by 20 times fluorescence microscopy.Results In TNF-α-stimulated-group,the number of MBp amounted to 12.0±2.6/view and the number of MB was just 3.0±1.2/view,there was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.01).Adhesion number of MBp in TNF-α stimulated mice were 6.4±1.7 and 9.9±2.1 fold greater than that of MBp and MB in mice without any treatment separately.There were(69.6±2.6)% and(56.6±25.4)% of MBp adhered directly to the venular endothelium in the two groups,while only(24.6±23.3)% and(20.0±27.4)% of MB.Conclusion Compared with MB,MBp could adhere to vascular endothelial efficiently and specifically,it can effectively evaluate the inflammation of vascular endothelium or other tissue injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?