Abstract:Crisis decision-making refers to the decisions made by decision-makers in crisis situations, that is when conditions such as time, resources and information are limited, quick judgment and behavioral response are made by decision-makers. In recent years, the studies of crisis decisionmaking are from the perspectives of self-decision-making. In daily life, we also need to make decisions for others, such as doctors need to offer patients the most appropriate treatment. Many studies have shown that there are differences between self and other decision-making. Similarly, in the crisis, we need to make decisions not only for ourselves, but also for others. In other words, those individuals who are in crisis situations will make decisions for themselves in the first time to avoid property losses and to protect their lives. Moreover, leaders who manages the crisis will make decisions for others by using limited clues. Construal level theory proposes that high-level construals are relatively abstract, coherent, and superordinate mental representations, compared with low-level construals. Is making decisions for ourselves in crisis situations the same as making such decisions for others? This is also the focus of our study. The present study employed two experiments to investigate the self-other crisis decision-making process of information processing.In Experiment 1, the experiment design was a one-way (decision-makers' role: self, other) within-subjects design. The materials were taken from Zheng (2007), modified with actual cases. These materials included individual's decision tasks in the fire crisis. A total of 63 undergraduates participated in the experiment. Their eye movements were recorded with the i View X-RED eye tracker. The results showed that there were differences in self-other crisis decision-making process of information processing. Specifically, there were longer reading time, longer mean fixation time, more fixations and more regression for oneself than for others. Framing effect refers to different descriptions on the same issue which leads to different decision-making. It has been proved that the framing effect exists in risky decision-making, cross-time decision-making, health and consumer decisionmaking. What kind of differences does it make in self-others crisis decision-making after we join the task framework?In Experiment 2, the experiment design was a 2 (decision-makers: self, others) × 2 (task framework: positive, negative) mixed design. The decision-makers were the between-subjects factor, and the task framework was the within-subjects factor. The materials were taken from Zheng (2007), combined with the real cases happened in the golden week of 2006. These materials included the decision tasks of crisis encountered in outdoor activities. A total of 64 undergraduates participated in the experiment. Their eye movements were recorded with the i View X-RED eye tracker. The results showed that there were longer reading time, longer mean fixation time, more fixations and more regression for oneself than for others in the positive framework. And there was no difference in the negative framework.In conclusion, there were significant differences in self-other crisis decision-making, embodied in the differences in search time, depth and pattern for information. Positive task framework had significant influences on self-other crisis decision-making. There was no difference in the negative framework.

On Relationship between Self-construal and Individual Behavior in Video-Mediated Multicultural Group Decision Making.

The Influence of Superordinate Identity on Group Decision Making Through Discussion

The Effect of Mixed American-Chinese Group Composition on Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making

Knowledge Transfer Between Expatriate and Host Country Nationals: the Role of Self-construal

Culture and self-construal in the age of globalization: an empirical inquiry based on multiple approaches

Constructivist Self-Construal: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Contextualized Self: when the Self Runs into Social Dilemmas

Multilingual and multimodal mediation in online intercultural conversations: a translingual perspective

Understanding participation on video sharing communities: The role of self-construal and community interactivity

Neural Mechanism of Cultural Influences on the Self-construal

The role of self-concept in cross-cultural communication

Self-Construal Between Han and Uyghur in China Relational Self Versus Collective Self : A Cross-Cultural Study in Interdependent

The Information Processing Process of Crisis Decision-Making for Self and Others: Evidence from Eye Movement

Cross-national differences in cooperative decision-making in mixed-motive business contexts: the mediating effect of vertical and horizontal individualism

Interdependent Self‐construal Matters in the Community Context: Relationships of Self‐construal with Community Identity and Participation

Differences in Aggressive Behavior of Individuals with Different Self-Construal Types after Social Exclusion in the Same Cultural Background

The Impact of Cultural Differences on Instant Messaging Communication in China and Germany

Relational Self Versus Collective Self

Beyond the 'East-West' Dichotomy: Global Variation in Cultural Models of Selfhood.

The Influence of Individualism Collectivism, Self-Monitoring, and Predicted-Outcome Value on Communication in Ingroup and Outgroup Relationships

Bright and Dark Sides: Does Collective Behavior Past Participation Experience Affect Participation Willingness?