Implantation of Left Ventricular Leads Using a Telescopic Catheter System

Francesco Zanon,Enrico Baracca,Gianni Pastore,Silvio Aggio,Gianluca Rigatelli,Cristina Dondina,Gilla Marras,Gabriele Braggion,Graziano Boaretto,Paolo Cardaioli,Mariapaola Galasso,Pietro Zonzin,S. Serge Barold
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00529.x
2005-01-01
EP Europace
Abstract:Background: Implantation procedures for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain challenging with regard to coronary sinus (CS) cannulation and left ventricular (LV) lead positioning. Technologic advances in catheter design may facilitate CS cannulation and LV lead placement. Aims: To evaluate two different telescoping dual‐catheter systems, RAPIDO Guiding Catheter System (Group R) and RAPIDO ADVANCE Guiding Catheter System (Group A) (Guidant Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA), during implantation of a CRT device. Methods: Seventy‐four consecutive patients randomly received a CRT device using the R or A system. Results: An LV lead was successfully implanted in 74 patients (100%). (1) Median times for CS cannulation in groups R and A were 0.3 minutes (range from 0.05 to 14 minutes) and 0.5 minutes (range from 0.05 to 9 minutes), respectively (P = NS). (2) Median times for LV lead placement were 8 minutes (range from 0.8 to 100 minutes) and 3.5 minutes (range from 0.25 to 30 minutes), respectively, for groups R and A (P = 0.032). (3) Median total fluoroscopy times were 12.33 minutes (range from 5 to 70 minutes) and 14.33 minutes (range from 6 to 53 minutes) for groups R and A, respectively (P = NS). (4) Median procedural times for CRT implantation were 80 minutes (range from 40 to 200 minutes) and 75 minutes (range from 45 to 180 minutes) (P = NS) in groups R and A, respectively. There were no major complications. Conclusion: CS cannulation and LV lead placement with a telescopic dual‐catheter system is a safe and feasible approach that may reduce fluoroscopy and overall CRT implantation times. Our observations suggest that the RAPIDO ADVANCE System is faster than the RAPIDO System in terms of median time for LV lead positioning.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?