Abstract:Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapeutic option in symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and evidence of left ventricular (LV) conduction delay (QRS width ≥120 ms), especially when typical left bundle branch block is present. The rationale behind CRT is restoration of aberrant LV electrical activation. As there is considerable heterogeneity of the LV electrical activation pattern among CRT candidates, an individualized approach with targeting of the LV lead in the region of latest electrical activation while avoiding scar tissue may enhance CRT response. Echocardiography, electro anatomic mapping, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement are helpful to guide such targeted LV lead placement. However, an important limitation remains the anatomy of the coronary sinus, which often does not allow concordant LV lead placement in the optimal region. Epicardial LV lead placement through minimal invasive surgery or endocardial LV lead placement through transseptal punction may overcome this limitation, obviously with an increased complication risk. Furthermore, recent pacing algorithms suggest superiority of LV-only versus biventricular pacing in patients with preserved atrio ventricular (AV) conduction and a typical LBBB pattern. Finally, pacing from only one LV site might not overcome the wide electrical dispersion often seen in patients with LV conduction delays. Therefore, multisite pacing has gained significant interest to improve CRT response. The use of multiple LV leads may potentially lead to more favorable reverse remodeling, improved functional capacity and quality of life in CRT candidates, but adverse events and a shorter battery span are more frequent because of the extra lead. The use of one multipolar LV lead increases the number of pacing configurations within the same coronary sinus side branch (within small distances from each other) without the use of an additional lead. Small observational studies suggest that more effective resynchronization can be achieved with this approach. Finally, there are many reasons for non effective CRT delivery in carefully selected patients with an adequately implanted device. Multidisciplinary, post implantation care inside a dedicated CRT clinic ensures optimal CRT delivery, improves response rate and should be considered standard of care.

Safety and efficacy of orthodromic snare technique in left ventricular lead delivery in cardiac resynchronization implantation

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

SPECT-Guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental CRT Efficacy

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Retrospective analysis of application of left ventricular active fixation lead in 26 cases

Trans-septal left ventricular endocardial lead in a patient with extensive anterior myocardial infarction and left ventricle (LV) apical endoventriculoplasty using a Vascutek patch-case report

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

Observational Study of Trans-Septal Endocardial Left Ventricle Lead Implant for Effective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Challenging Coronary Sinus Anatomy

Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods

Primary experience with an active fixation coronary sinus lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy

[Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Epicardial Lead Placement for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy].

A novel approach for left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Intraprocedural integration of coronary venous electroanatomic mapping with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Application of Epicardial Lead for Left Ventricle Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

A novel method combining gated SPECT and vectorcardiography to guide left ventricular lead placement to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A proof of concept study

Lead positioning for cardiac resynchronization therapy: techniques and priorities

LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD PLACEMENT TARGETED AT THE LATEST ACTIVATED SITE GUIDED BY ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MAPPING IN CORONARY SINUS BRANCHES IMPROVES RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY

Optimizing electrical efficacy of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy and leadless left ventricular septal pacing: Insights on left and right ventricular activation from electrocardiographic imaging

Location, Location, Location: A Pilot Study to Compare Electrical with Echocardiographic-Guided Targeting of Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

Initial Experience in Transvenous Implantation of a Left Ventricular Lead with a Novel Venogram Balloon Catheter