Abstract:ObjectiveTransvenous insertion of LV pacing leads via the coronary sinus is flawed in multiple areas including unsuccessful rate in 8–10% of patients and site selection bias. This study describes short-term follow up of minimally invasive surgical techniques for CRT as a viable alternative for patients with heart failure.MethodsFrom April 2007 to December 2008, 10 patients (male 6, 59±8.6 year) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III–IV symptoms, LV ejection fraction 26.8 ± 11.9% and LV systolic dyssynchrony underwent LV epicardial lead placements via minimally invasive thoracoscope. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was used to assess changes in LV function and dyssynchronic parameters. Also, echo was used to select the best site for LV epicardial lead placement.ResultsAll patients reported symptomatic benefit with reduction in New York Heart Association score from III–IV preoperatively to II postoperatively. Comparing with baseline, post CRT for 10 HF patients, LV diastolic diameter(LVD) decreased from 69.4 ±13.6 mm to 60.0 ± 6.9 mm (P< 0.05), and LV ejection fraction (EF) increased from 34.5 ±7.3 % to 42.6 ± 6.6 % (P< 0.05) . LV intraventricular dyssynchrony index decreased from 143.0± 30.9 ms to 54.0 ± 17.4ms(P<0.05).ConclusionVideo-assisted thoracoscopic placement of the LV epicardial lead is feasible, safe, and efficacious. TDI can guide the epicardial lead placement to the ideal target location. ObjectiveTransvenous insertion of LV pacing leads via the coronary sinus is flawed in multiple areas including unsuccessful rate in 8–10% of patients and site selection bias. This study describes short-term follow up of minimally invasive surgical techniques for CRT as a viable alternative for patients with heart failure. Transvenous insertion of LV pacing leads via the coronary sinus is flawed in multiple areas including unsuccessful rate in 8–10% of patients and site selection bias. This study describes short-term follow up of minimally invasive surgical techniques for CRT as a viable alternative for patients with heart failure. MethodsFrom April 2007 to December 2008, 10 patients (male 6, 59±8.6 year) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III–IV symptoms, LV ejection fraction 26.8 ± 11.9% and LV systolic dyssynchrony underwent LV epicardial lead placements via minimally invasive thoracoscope. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was used to assess changes in LV function and dyssynchronic parameters. Also, echo was used to select the best site for LV epicardial lead placement. From April 2007 to December 2008, 10 patients (male 6, 59±8.6 year) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III–IV symptoms, LV ejection fraction 26.8 ± 11.9% and LV systolic dyssynchrony underwent LV epicardial lead placements via minimally invasive thoracoscope. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was used to assess changes in LV function and dyssynchronic parameters. Also, echo was used to select the best site for LV epicardial lead placement. ResultsAll patients reported symptomatic benefit with reduction in New York Heart Association score from III–IV preoperatively to II postoperatively. Comparing with baseline, post CRT for 10 HF patients, LV diastolic diameter(LVD) decreased from 69.4 ±13.6 mm to 60.0 ± 6.9 mm (P< 0.05), and LV ejection fraction (EF) increased from 34.5 ±7.3 % to 42.6 ± 6.6 % (P< 0.05) . LV intraventricular dyssynchrony index decreased from 143.0± 30.9 ms to 54.0 ± 17.4ms(P<0.05). All patients reported symptomatic benefit with reduction in New York Heart Association score from III–IV preoperatively to II postoperatively. Comparing with baseline, post CRT for 10 HF patients, LV diastolic diameter(LVD) decreased from 69.4 ±13.6 mm to 60.0 ± 6.9 mm (P< 0.05), and LV ejection fraction (EF) increased from 34.5 ±7.3 % to 42.6 ± 6.6 % (P< 0.05) . LV intraventricular dyssynchrony index decreased from 143.0± 30.9 ms to 54.0 ± 17.4ms(P<0.05). ConclusionVideo-assisted thoracoscopic placement of the LV epicardial lead is feasible, safe, and efficacious. TDI can guide the epicardial lead placement to the ideal target location. Video-assisted thoracoscopic placement of the LV epicardial lead is feasible, safe, and efficacious. TDI can guide the epicardial lead placement to the ideal target location.

Trans-septal left ventricular endocardial lead in a patient with extensive anterior myocardial infarction and left ventricle (LV) apical endoventriculoplasty using a Vascutek patch-case report

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Observational Study of Trans-Septal Endocardial Left Ventricle Lead Implant for Effective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Challenging Coronary Sinus Anatomy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

SPECT-Guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental CRT Efficacy

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

Atrial Transseptal Left Ventricular Lead Implantation for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Arteriovenous Loop Technique

Safety and efficacy of orthodromic snare technique in left ventricular lead delivery in cardiac resynchronization implantation

Strategy for Failed Transvenous Left-Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Surrender or Struggle?

Retrospective analysis of application of left ventricular active fixation lead in 26 cases

Implantation of Left Ventricular Leads Using a Telescopic Catheter System

Application of Epicardial Lead for Left Ventricle Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Novel atrioventricular sequential pacing approach using a transvenous atrial pacemaker and a leadless pacemaker: a case report

Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods

Initial Experience in Transvenous Implantation of a Left Ventricular Lead with a Novel Venogram Balloon Catheter

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implantation with shock lead placement in the left bundle branch area: a case report

0300: A Short-Term Follow-Up Study of Left Ventricular Epicardial Lead Placement for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Clinical Investigation of Left Ventricular Pacing Using Coronary Sinus in Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic Tricuspid Valve Replacement

Lead positioning for cardiac resynchronization therapy: techniques and priorities