Abstract:The term ″Human Security″ was fostered by the United Nations Development Program in the first part of 1990s. From then on, Human Security has rapidly moved to occupy center stage in discussion of foreign policy and other related issues. Different scholars have probed into its significance from aspects of definition, connotation, value basis and application. Critics allege that existing definitions tend to be extraordinarily expansive and vague, encompassing everything from physical security to psychological well-being, which makes it impossible to prioritize policies and actions and provides policymakers with little guidance in the operationalisation. Some argue that it is merely ″old wine in new bottles″, combining traditional concerns about ″freedom from fear″ and ″freedom from want″, roughly parallel to the first and second generation of human rights. Others argue that the concept is ″too idealistic″, and fails to take into account the real-world politics of geopolitical power in a rapidly changing international system. And treating individuals as the referent object of security does not always represent the best means of understanding a particular situation of insecurity. For example, issues of identity and ethnic difference may be ignored. And because of its vagueness and breadth, states may benefit from positive perceptions of Human Security without seeking fundamentally to institutionalize Human Security concerns within political practice. It has the ambition to be a catch-all approach to global problems but is often trapped in unconscious ″cultural centralism″ under the banner of universalism. But advocators insist that the inclusion within the rubric of security (through the Human Security approach) of factors as diverse as environmental change, military security, human rights and development inequality help us to acknowledge the relatedness of these problems in terms of their origins and broad solutions. They believe that the concept's strength lies in its holism and inclusiveness, and definitional expansiveness and ambiguity are its powerful attributes. While those critics might prefer to limit the concept, focusing on some insecurities and excluding others, they insist that Human Security will necessarily remain comprehensive and integrative and the holistic nature of this perspective is particularly valuable to women, who are often more vulnerable than men. Furthermore, they argue that Human Security should be seen as a discourse rather than policy agenda of security, and shouldn't been judged by standards for instrumental concepts. These controversies can be sorted into two categories: those on the theoretical origin of the Human Security approach and those on the definition and explanation forwarded by UNDP. They reflect the divarication on the subjective perception and value judgment of the connotation of security among different international agents.

Environmental Security from a Gender Perspective:The Feminist Critique and Its Prospects

Review of the Current Trend of Environmental Security Research

The Many Faces of Environmental Security

Problematizing “Security” in Citizen Security: A feminist security studies critique of Mexico's “feminist” foreign policy and women, peace and security projects

Cultural Security of Contemporary Nations in View of " Non-traditional Security Studies"

"Human security" and "environmental human rights":a review of Human Security and the UN:a Critical History

Global trends and characteristics of ecological security research in the early 21st century: A literature review and bibliometric analysis

Intersectional feminism for the environmental studies and sciences: looking inward and outward

Security in the anthropocene: Environment, ecology, escape

Gender and City Community Safety:Women's Participation in "lower Class Politics"

Amendment of the Protection System of Agrarian Land from the Viewpoint of Ecofeminism

Gender Identity and the Subject of Security

The Environmental Approach to Security: A Historical-Theoretical Literature Review on Space and Crime

Is Global Green Governance Possible? Green Justice and Overcoming the Dilemma of Ecological Security

Controversies on the Value of Human Security

THREE DESCRIPTIONS ON FUNCTION OF RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT FOUNDATION

Ecofeminist Science Fiction: International Perspectives on Gender, Ecology, and Literature

Securitization:How Ecological Issues Become a Matter of Security

Non-traditional Security Keeping:Boundary,Setting,and Paradigm

A feminist opening of resilience: Elizabeth Grosz, Liberian Peace Huts and IR critiques

China and Environmental Security in the Age of Consequences