A Comparative Study of Two Embolic Agents for Uterine Fibroids Embolization

郭文波,杨建勇,陈伟,庄文权
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9324.2006.04.017
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate clinical value of two embolic agents(mixed liquor of lipiodol and pingyangmycin, and polyvinyl alcohol)for uterine fibroids embolization.Materials and Methods 110 patients with uterine fibroids were divided into two groups.51 patients were embolized with mixed liquor of lipiodol and pingyangmycin(goup A). 59 patients were embolized with polyvinyl alcohol (group B). 110 cases had been following up 48 to 72months(average 36±6months), the clinical effects and complications were observed.Results The symptom of excessive menstrual blood volume was greatly improved in 48 out of 49 patients in group A, and 45 out of 45 patients in group B. The bulked-related symptoms were improved in 13 out of 13 patients in group A, and 11 out of 11 patients in group B. There was no significant statistical difference in clinical effects between group A and B. The volume of uterus was reduced 50.92±2.78% in group A and 51.87±3.12% in group B. There was no significant statistical difference in the change of uterus'volume between group A and B (t value 1.688, P0.005). The volume of uterine fibroids was reduced 65.12±5.68% in group A and 62.94±7.23% in group B. There was no significant statistical difference in the change of fibroids' volume between group A and B (t value 1.769, P0.05). There was no significant statistical difference in serum sexual hormones level between group A and B. There was no significant statistical difference in incidences of slight complication between group A and B, but permanent ovarian failure was found in 3 cases of group A, non-targeted embolization of bladder was found in 1 cases of group A. The recurrent fibroids were found in 2 cases of group A and 2 cases of group B 2 years later after uterine fibroids embolization.Conclusion According to the middle and long term of uterine fibroids embolization, there is no significant difference in clinical effects and the incidences of complications between both embolic agents(mixed liquor of lipiodol and pingyangmycim, polyvinyl alcohol). Due to the liquid character of lipiodol which is easy to cause serious complications as non-targeted embolization, the mixed liquor of lipiodol and pingyangmycin should be prudently chosen in uterine fibroid embolization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?