On What Should Be Written in the Constitutional Code——Judging by the Objective and Stability of the Constitution

HE Ling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-4133.2006.03.017
2006-01-01
Abstract:The reason why the academic circles differ on the component of the constitutional code is that the standard of judgment is unclear.Since the constitutional code is the law to safeguard human rights in the country with written form,and the supreme legal validity of the constitutional code demands that the constitutional code should keep its stability and authority,whether the contents of constitutional code are suitable or not,it should be judged by the conformity of contents with the objective of the constitution and the stability of the constitutional code.On this standard,the norms about the power of state should be the main contents of the constitutional code.The fundamental rights of citizens and the mark of state are the contents which could be or could not be written in the constitutional code,and the duty of citizens,the economic institutions,the fundamental policy and the records of history should not be written in the constitutional code.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?