Abstract:Objectives: 1) To show the role and place of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (RFO) in removing the vertical reflux in the varicose major superficial large-diameter veins. 2) To assess the outcomes of treatment of patients with varicose disease and to determine their correlation with the scales VCSS, VSDS and CEAP. Material and methods: Endovascular methods, the technique of endovascular radiofrequency (RFO) ClosureFAST belongs to, are intended to within the shortest terms remove reflux without disturbing the patient's habitual way of life and along with it to improve the main aspects of quality of life.From 2009 to 2011, we operated on 110 patients (a total of 135 extremities). The mean age amounted to 41 years. Patients with an ostium-adjacent venous diameter of less than 1.3 cm were excluded from the sample, 37% of patients had various trophic impairments, 41% of patients had various concomitant somatic pathology, and 17% of patients had the body weight index (BWI) exceeding 30. Diagnosis and severity of the disease were formed with due regard for the scales of disease severity VCSS, VSDS and CEAP, as well as the worked out diagnostic algorithm. The venous status was evaluated by the findings of the objective examination and triplex angioscanning. The groups of patients with reflux along the altered venous segments were distributed as follows: 32.6% of patients - the superior vena cava with the classical course, 8% - the inferior vena cava, 7% - vein of Giacomini, 16% - the anterior accessory vein, 8% - the anterior lateral inflow, 28.4% - the extrafascial course of the vessel. The pain factor according to the analogue scale amounted to 0.8. In the postoperative period, the patients were followed up and examined on day 3, day 10 and then after 1, 3, 6, 12 months and more. Results: RFO was successfully used in patients in all venous basins irrespective of the diameter and anatomical course of the venous structures. In 98% of cases we managed to achieve occlusion with the removal of the reflux within the terms of up to one year. Regress of clinical symptoms and improvement of quality of life were reflected in the VCSS. 100% of patients returned to the habitual activity on the day of operation. Conclusion: RFO with obvious efficacy may be used in various topographical areas of lower limbs regardless of the veins' diameter and their anatomical course. RFO is a method of choice in patients with high BMI and accompanying somatic pathology. Ambulatory follow up of patients with severe somatic pathology is possible, independently of decompensation of venous pathology. Clinical scales of the disease severity VCSS and VSDS are convenient in use, clearly reflecting the dynamics of the disease in the pre- and postoperative periods, which makes it possible to recommend them for wide application along with other scales on studying quality of life.

Radiofrequency endovenous obliteration for the treatment of varicose veins

A comparative study on radiofrequency endovenous obliteration (RFO) and saphenous veins stripping for the treatment of varicose veins

Follow-up Analysis of Endovenous Radiofrequency Obliteration for a Treatment of Superficial Varicosities in Lower Extremity in the Elderly

Radiofrequency Obliteration of Varicose Veins of Lower Extremity Guided by Combined Venography and Ultrasonography

[Radiofrequency obliteration of veins in surgical treatment of varicose disease]

Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities

[Efficacy of Integrated Minimally Invasive Treatment for Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome with Varicose Veins of Lower Extremities].

The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Varicose Veins of Lower Limbs

Radiofrequency ablation for uncomplicated varicose veins

Experience and Early Results of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Varicose Veins

Endovenous Radiofrequency,laser in Combination with Surgery for Treatment of Venous Insufficiency in Lower Extremity

Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation using a radiofrequency needle device for varicose ulcer: A non-randomized controlled prospective study

Endovenous Microwave Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Lower Limb Varicose Veins

Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Laser Ablation in Patients with Lower Extremity Varicose Veins: A Meta-analysis

A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency versus Laser Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients with Varicose Veins

Endovenous Laser Treatment for Lower Limbs Varicosities:A Report of 106 Cases

Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: Best practice techniques and evidence

Consensus for the Treatment of Varicose Vein with Radiofrequency Ablation

Comparison of one-year outcomes and quality of life between radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation in the treatment of lower extremity varicose veins: A retrospective cohort study

Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous venous insufficiency using a newly developed VENISTAR catheter: A preliminary study

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation in combination with TriVex for treatment of chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremity