Abstract:Endovenous ablation of varicose veins using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) has reported advantages over traditional open surgical treatment. There is little evidence comparing the efficacy and patient-reported outcomes between the two endovenous solutions. This study compares the RFA and EVLT strategies in a prospective double-blind clinical trial. Consecutive patients with primary unilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux undergoing endovenous treatment were randomized to RFA (VNUS ClosureFAST) or EVLT (810-nm diode laser). The primary outcome measure was GSV occlusion at 3 months after treatment. Secondary outcome measures were occlusion at 7 days, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising, assessed at day 7 after surgery. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D. A total of 159 patients were randomized to RFA (79 patients) or EVLT (80 patients). Groups were well matched for demographics, disease extent, severity, and preoperative QoL. Duplex scanning confirmed 100% vein occlusion at 1 week in both groups. At 3 months, occlusion was 97% for RFA and 96% for EVLT; P = 0.67. Median (interquartile range) percentage above-knee bruise area was greater after EVLT 3.85% (6.1) than after RFA 0.6% (2); P = 0.0001. Postoperative pain assessed at each of the first 7 postoperative days was less after RFA (P = 0.001). Changes in the AVVQ (P = 0.12) and EQ-5D (P = 0.66) at 3 months were similar in both groups. RFA and EVLT offer comparable venous occlusion rates at 3 months after treatment of primary GSV varices; with neither modality proving superior. RFA is associated with less periprocedural pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising. Endovenous ablation of varicose veins using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) has reported advantages over traditional open surgical treatment. There is little evidence comparing the efficacy and patient-reported outcomes between the two endovenous solutions. This chapter presents a study that compares the RFA and EVLT strategies in a prospective double-blind clinical trial. Consecutive patients with primary unilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux undergoing endovenous treatment were randomized to RFA (VNUS ClosureFAST) or EVLT. The primary outcome measure was GSV occlusion at 3 months after treatment. Secondary outcome measures were occlusion at 7 days, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising, assessed at day 7 after surgery. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D. RFA is associated with less periprocedural pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising.

Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous venous insufficiency using a newly developed VENISTAR catheter: A preliminary study

A comparative study on radiofrequency endovenous obliteration (RFO) and saphenous veins stripping for the treatment of varicose veins

Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy of Great Saphenous Veins Insufficiency

Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities

Follow-up Analysis of Endovenous Radiofrequency Obliteration for a Treatment of Superficial Varicosities in Lower Extremity in the Elderly

A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency versus Laser Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients with Varicose Veins

Radiofrequency ablation versus high ligation and stripping for the treatment of symptomatic great saphenous vein insufficiency: Short-term patient-reported outcomes

Endovenous thermal ablation mid-term outcomes for the treatment of large diameter incompetent great saphenous veins

Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus direct and indirect radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins

Interventions for great saphenous vein insufficiency: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Consensus for the Treatment of Varicose Vein with Radiofrequency Ablation

The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Varicose Veins of Lower Limbs

Application of Femoral Nerve Block in Treating Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency by Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Punctate Stripping

Combination of Minimally Invasive Methods for the Treatment of Varicose Veins

Radiofrequency ablation for uncomplicated varicose veins

Endovenous glue ablation for chronic venous insufficiency: A comprehensive 5-year assessment of clinical and hemodynamic outcomes

Safety and Efficacy of Combining Saphenous Endovenous Laser Ablation and Varicose Veins Foam Sclerotherapy: An Analysis on 5500 Procedures in Patients With Advance Chronic Venous Disease (C3-C6)

Comparison of cyanoacrylate closure and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins: 36-Month outcomes of the VeClose randomized controlled trial

Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Laser Ablation in Patients with Lower Extremity Varicose Veins: A Meta-analysis

Clinical outcomes of nonthermal ablation, thermal ablation, and surgical stripping for varicose veins

One Year Follow-Up of Endovascular Microwave Ablation and Concomitant Foam Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Primary Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency