Comparison of Different Threshold 18 FDG PET with Computer Tomography for Defining Gross Tumor Volume in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

CHEN Shao-qing,YU Jin-ming,FU Zheng,XIN Lig-ang,YANG Guo-ren,GONG Heyi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1004-4221.2006.06.016
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective Under different standard uptake value(SUV),to assess gross tumor volume (GTV) definition for non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) with 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (~(18)FDG PET) both under definite threshold (42 percent threshold) and various relative threshold (threshold SUV/maximum SUV) derived from the linear regressive function,threshold SUV=0.307×(mean target SUV)+0.588,with computer tomography (CT).Methods Of 20 patients with non-small cell lung cancer,the CT GTV (GTV_(?)).PET GTV with 42 percents threshold (GTV_(42%)) and PET GTV with relative threshold (GTV_(?)) were obtained and compared.Results The mean GTV_(42%),,mean GTV_(?) and mean GTV_(CT) was (13 812.5±13 841.4),(24 325.3±22 454.7) and (28 350.9±26 079.8)mm~3,respectively,with the difference in mean GTV among these three methods significant (F =10,P<0.01).The GTV_(42%) was smaller than the GTV_(?) and the GTV_(CT)(P<0.01),with i(?)significant difference between GTV_(?) and GTV_(CT)(P=0.125).Conclusion The relative threshold is more suitable to define the gross tumor volume than the definite threshold.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?