On the Difference between the History of Philosophy and the History of Thought:a Discussion with Prof. Ge Zhaoguang

Ding Weixiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0511-4721.2013.03.007

2013-01-01

Abstract:In the halls of twentieth century Chinese academia , the "history of philosophy" and the "history of thought" have been two parallel concepts,sometimes even being used interchangeably.On the one hand,the concept of "philosophy" is a Western one,so calling the history of philosophy "the history of thought" seems to maintain a certain notion of national tradition;on the other hand,as the history of philosophy and the history of thought often deal with the same object, only differing from each other in range and scope,the history of philosophy and the history of thought seem posses similar parameters of discussion.In reality, although the history of philosophy and the history of thought have the same object of their research,the differences between them mainly lie in their different perspectives,methods of analysis,and approaches to interpretation.Although the concept of philosophy as an academic discipline originates from the West,the idea of researching the nature and history of thought has always existed in China.Hence ,the studies which substitute the history of thought for the history of philosophy have neither historical nor cultural justification.