Self-Ontology versus Counter-Ontology: The Hermeneutic Basis of Chinese and Western Philosophy

Hu Weixi
2005-01-01
Abstract:The fundamental difference between Chinese and Western philosophy is that between self-ontological thinking and counter-ontological thinking. The former means that the cognitive object and the cognitive subject cannot be separated from each other, thus laying stress on the self presentation of the Self, while the latter indicates that Being is seen, first of all, as an objective existence, and then its objective truth is to be explored. Either self-ontological thinking or counter-ontological thinking is the objective reflection of man’s duality. The self-ontological approach focuses on the examination and study of man’s instrumental subsistence, and the counter-ontological one is concerned about the examination and study of the subsistence of man as the reason of value. Owing to the fact that man’s instrumental dimension and his value dimension are interrelated to, complementary with, and rely on, each other, the development of future philosophy requires that these two modes of thinking; and what is meant by the convergence of Chinese and Western philosophy refers to that either of them should learn from the hermeneutic stance and tradition of the other while keeping their respective traditional hermeneutic basis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?