A New Measure of Liquidity

Yongxiang Wang,Weixing Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850600606075

2007-01-01

Applied Economics Letters

Abstract:We propose a new measure of market liquidity based on the investors' optimal searching behaviour. Thus, we add a wealth filter on Pagano (1989)'s measure of liquidity to build the strong tie between endogenous market participation and investor wealth, as has been documented by empirical works.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A Market-Based Funding Liquidity Measure

Zhuo Chen,Andrea Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/ray007

2019-01-01

Abstract:We construct a traded funding liquidity measure from stock returns. Guided by a model, we extract the measure as the return spread between two beta-neutral portfolios constructed using stocks with high and low margins, to control for their sensitivity to the aggregate funding shocks. Our measure of funding liquidity is correlated with other funding liquidity proxies. It delivers a positive risk premium that cannot be explained by existing risk factors. A model augmented by our funding liquidity measure has superior pricing performance for various portfolios. Despite evident comovement, this measure contains additional information that is not subsumed by market liquidity.Received March 29, 2017; accepted August 8, 2018 by Editor Wayne Ferson.
The Comparison Study of Liquidity Measurements on the Chinese Stock Markets

Yang Gao,Wandi Zhao,Mingjin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2019.1709819

2020-01-01

Emerging Markets Finance and Trade

Abstract:The measurement of liquidity is the basis of research in market microstructure studies. Based on the intraday tick trading data on Chinese stock markets from 2009 to 2016, we run horseraces of monthly estimates of newly and widely employed low-frequency liquidity proxies in the literature against three types of bid-ask spread high-frequency benchmarks. The empirical results reveal that the closing percent quoted spread estimator has the smallest estimation error, and the FHT estimator has the highest correlation. Moreover, these two estimators win the majority of horseraces in terms of estimation error and correlation comparison with the high-frequency benchmarks. Meanwhile, we find that most liquidity estimators based on Roll's model do not perform well. Because the performance metrics of estimation precision or correlation performance on related liquidity issues differ depending on the type of research, our study offers appropriate liquidity measures for different research purposes.
An Evaluation of Low-frequency Liquidity Proxies:An Empirical Analysis Based on the Chinese Stock Market

Xiao-yuan WAN,Chao-jun YANG,Da-yong LV

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11847/fj.37.2.50

2018-01-01

Forecasting

Abstract:Using the high-frequency transaction data from 2006 to 2015 in the Chinese stock market,we compute liquidity benchmarks of three dimensions—width,depth,and price impact,and run horseraces of low-frequency liquidity proxies, which are commonly used in the literature of past two decades,against liquidity benchmarks. Based on three performance metrics,i.e.,average cross-sectional correlation, portfolio time-series correlation, and prediction error, our empirical results show that in the Chinese stock market, RollKLis the best low-frequency liquidity proxy in the width dimension;trading volume is the best low-frequency liquidity proxy in the depth dimension; AmihudYCJis the best low-frequency liquidity proxy in the price impact dimension and Amihud is also a good one. This paper provides a reference for future studies on liquidity in the Chinese stock market.
Measuring the Perceived Liquidity of the Corporate Bond Market

Sergey Chernenko,Aditya Sunderam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3583872

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We propose a novel measure of bond market liquidity that does not depend on transaction data: the strength of the cross-sectional relationship between mutual fund cash holdings and fund flow volatility. Our measure captures how liquid funds perceive their portfolio holdings to be at a given point in time. The perceived liquidity of speculative grade and Rule 144A bonds is significantly lower than investment grade bonds in the cross section and deteriorated significantly following the 2008-9 financial crisis. Our measure can be applied in settings where either transaction data are not available or transactions are rare, including the markets for asset-backed securities, syndicated loans, and municipal bonds.
Liquidity Risk and Expected Returns in China's Stock Market: A Multidimensional Liquidity Approach

Liang Dong,Bo Yu,Zhenjiang Qin,Keith S.K. Lam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4397887

IF: 6.5

2024-01-26

Research in International Business and Finance

Abstract:We propose a multidimensional liquidity measure constructed from 6 out of 17 individual low-frequency liquidity proxies. The multidimensional liquidity risk factor yields significant positive premiums and offers distinguished explanatory power on the cross-sectional return variations in China's stock market. A six-factor liquidity (L-6F) model is the best-performing liquidity-embedded model for the Chinese market. The L-6F model outperforms the Fama and French (2015) five-factor model at explaining a series of return anomalies such as volatility, momentum, reversal, and skewness. Interestingly, the liquidity risk premium enlarges when market uncertainty escalates and systematic liquidity tightens, consistent with the "flight-to-liquidity" effect. Lastly, the multidimensional liquidity measure effectively captures high-frequency liquidity information and remains robust with alternative regression settings and liquidity estimation methods. The proposed multidimensional liquidity measure can be applied in liquidity risk management and liquidity-based trading strategies, and the L-6F model can be utilized in estimating risk-adjusted returns in China's stock market.

business, finance
Liquidity risk and expected returns in China’s stock market: A multidimensional liquidity approach

Liang Dong,Bo Yu,Zhenjiang Qin,Keith S.K. Lam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102247

IF: 6.5

2024-04-01

Research in International Business and Finance

Abstract:We propose a multidimensional liquidity measure constructed from 6 out of 17 individual low-frequency liquidity proxies. The multidimensional liquidity risk factor yields significant positive premiums and offers distinguished explanatory power on the cross-sectional return variations in China’s stock market. A six-factor liquidity (L-6F) model is the best-performing liquidity-embedded model for the Chinese market. The L-6F model outperforms the Fama and French (2015) five-factor model at explaining a series of return anomalies such as volatility, momentum, reversal, and skewness. Interestingly, the liquidity risk premium enlarges when market uncertainty escalates and systematic liquidity tightens, consistent with the “flight-to-liquidity” effect. Lastly, the multidimensional liquidity measure effectively captures high-frequency liquidity information and remains robust with alternative regression settings and liquidity estimation methods. The proposed multidimensional liquidity measure can be applied in liquidity risk management and liquidity-based trading strategies, and the L-6F model can be utilized in estimating risk-adjusted returns in China’s stock market.

business, finance
Measuring market liquidity: An introductory survey

Alexandros Gabrielsen,Massimiliano Marzo,Paolo Zagaglia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1112.6169

2011-12-29

Abstract:Asset liquidity in modern financial markets is a key but elusive concept. A market is often said to be liquid when the prevailing structure of transactions provides a prompt and secure link between the demand and supply of assets, thus delivering low costs of transaction. Providing a rigorous and empirically relevant definition of market liquidity has, however, provided to be a difficult task. This paper provides a critical review of the frameworks currently available for modelling and estimating the market liquidity of assets. We consider definitions that stress the role of the bid-ask spread and the estimation of its components that arise from alternative sources of market friction. In this case, intra-daily measures of liquidity appear relevant for capturing the core features of a market, and for their ability to describe the arrival of new information to market participants.

Trading and Market Microstructure,General Finance,Portfolio Management
Study of Mutual Funds' Liquidity Index

SHUAI Jin-yao,CHEN Xiao-jian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3221.2006.03.025

2006-01-01

Abstract:This paper introduces the concept and the index design of the mutual fund's liquidity.First we give an empirical analysis of the index,then we discuss the meaning of this research.
In Search of the Best Proxy for Liquidity in Asset Pricing Studies on the Warsaw Stock Exchange

Szymon Stereńczak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21274-2_3

2019-01-01

Abstract:Stock liquidity is unobservable, and thus, its level needs to be approximated. There is a large body of liquidity measures recorded in the existing literature. The main goal of this paper is to investigate which measure is the most appropriate one to measure stock liquidity for the purposes of asset pricing studies on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. To indicate the most appropriate proxy for liquidity, a series of correlation analysis between different liquidity measures and estimation error measures have been applied. Four high-frequency liquidity measures were used as a benchmark for liquidity, and fourteen low-frequency liquidity proxies were examined. The study was conducted on a group of 100 companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange between 2006 and 2016. The ranking of low-frequency proxies for liquidity has been created based on eleven performance dimensions. It shows that the most appropriate liquidity measure on the Warsaw Stock Exchange is that developed by Fong et al. [12], which is a simplification of the zero-return-days measure developed by Lesmond et al. [20]. In addition, two modifications of Amihud’s [2] illiquidity are presented as the second and third best-performing ones. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first such extensive study of the performance of liquidity measures on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. It examines both existing liquidity measures and some modifications proposed on the basis of the literature overview.
Limited Market Access and Funding Liquidity

Zhuo Chen,Andrea Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2311761

2013-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In this paper, we construct a measure for funding liquidity that exploits information in both the time series and cross-section of stock returns. We show that in an economy where investors face asset-specific funding constraints (margins), the risk premium of a market-neutral portfolio that longs levered low-beta stocks and shorts de-levered high-beta stocks, as in Frazzini and Pedersen (2013), depends on both the market-wide funding conditions and stocks' margin requirements. We isolate funding liquidity shocks as the return difference between two zero-beta portfolios constructed using stocks with high and low margins. Our market-based funding liquidity measure is highly correlated with other proxies proposed in the literature, and cannot be explained by existing pricing factors, such as the Fama-French three factors. Moreover, our measure helps explain the cross-section of hedge fund returns: hedge funds with the lowest funding liquidity betas earn 10.7% per year higher returns than their peers whose returns strongly comove with funding liquidity shocks. This return spread cannot be explained by the Fung-Hsieh seven hedge fund risk factors. We provide several explanations for this finding, including hedge funds' lock-up capital, serial correlations of hedge fund returns, and funds' skill in timing funding liquidity shocks.
Will Introduction of Liquidity Reduce the Utility of Wealth?——Analysis from Theory Perspective

姚亚伟,杨朝军,黄峰

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2009.11.017

2009-01-01

Abstract:Considering one-period investment and taking the maximization of expected utility of end wealth as objective,this paper introduces the liquidity as executing cost into the utility function model thus extends the investment perspective to the three dimension space from the two dimension space.The research results show that: firstly,the expected utility of end wealth is a decreasing function of illiquidity and variance of illiquidity;secondly,introduction of liquidity may not reduce the expected utility of end-period wealth.
Measuring Liquidity with Return Volatility: an Analytical Approach Based on Heavy-Tailed Censored-GARCH Model

Wandi Zhao,Yang Gao,Mingjin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101774

2022-01-01

Abstract:The measurement of liquidity based on low-frequency data is a crucial issue in the financial market microstructure literature. This paper extends the commonly used LOT liquidity model by incorporating the characterization of the volatility dynamics and distributional properties of return series, thereby significantly improving both the goodness-of-fit of liquidity model and the estimation performance of the existing low-frequency liquidity measures. The new models, which have a special form of heavy-tailed Censored-GARCH model, have challenges in estimation. We then provide an approximate maximum likelihood estimation method to circumvent this problem. A real data analysis is conducted to evaluate the performance of the new liquidity measures. The results show overwhelming evidence that our new measures have advantages over the existing measures in both estimation error and correlation coefficient with high-frequency bid-ask spread. The robustness check analysis further illustrates that the advantages of our new measures are stable across different stock industries and different turnover levels.
Liquidity and Predictable Return of Shares:An Experimental Test

Yan Dongpeng,Wu Guisheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-4565.2006.08.016

2006-01-01

Abstract:ince Amihud(2002),researchers have realized that liquidity may be able to capture the predictable variation of stock return.However,it is still unclear why liquidity has predictability.With daily trading data of Shanghai and Shenzhen Security Exchanges from Jan 2,1996 to Dec 31,2004,this paper utilizes a rolling analysis to construct an illiquidity measure similar to Amihud(2002).under the 5-by-5 portfolio space of Fama and French,departure from stochastic discount factor framework,we apply a first-stage GMM to empirically test the conditional CAPM with market liquidity serving as an instrument.The empirical results indicate that,market liquidity indeed can predict the stock return,and this predictability sources from its capability of capturing time-variation of stock return.Our study at least partially bridge an academic gap.
Stock Liquidity, Heterogenous Institutional Investors and Investment Efficiency

Jingwen SUN,Peng WANG,Chao ZHANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.201901005

2019-01-01

Abstract:By emphasizing the governance role of institutional investors, this paper studies stock liquidity′s influence on investment efficiency, and measures the stock liquidity by calculating the relative effective spread based on the high-frequency data of listed companies in 2003-2016, and uses propensity score matching method and differences in difference method to carry out the empirical test.Results show that:First, there is a complete mediation effect between stock liquidity and investment efficiency, namely, institutional investor is the mediation variable and stock liquidity does not directly affect the investment efficiency, but rather through to reflect the influence of institutional investorownership.Second, in private enterprises, stock liquidity can improve the shareholding ratio of institutional investors and play an active role to improve investment efficiency;Moreover, this kind of promotion is regulated by the heterogeneity of the institutional investors, and the Fund (MF) has the strongest intermediary role and the weakest QFII.Finally, there is no significant relationship between stock liquidity and investment efficiency in state-owned enterprises.
Liquidity phenomenon: Essence, criteria, properties and impact on the market and investment value of assets

Yuri Kozyr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s042473880018961-6

2022-01-01

Abstract:The paper is devoted to the study of the "liquidity" phenomenon from the standpoint of the economic and mathematical approach. The existing definitions are presented, as well as four criteria of liquidity and one criterion of illiquidity. Theoretical analysis of the properties of liquidity was carried out. Particular attention is paid to such transaction costs as spread and time factor. It is shown that liquidity is not an immanent category of an asset — it is a derivative of several factors characteristic of both the asset and its market environment. Based on the analysis, a microeconomic condition for emergence of liquidity phenomenon, possible methods and ways of identifying the degree of liquidity, as well as methods for assessing liquidity costs are proposed. Additionally, methods are proposed for assessing the economic benefits of liquidity and their contribution to the cost of similar and different assets. To assess the individual benefits of liquidity, the concepts of "equalizing rate" and "compensatory equivalent" were introduced, which are subsequently integrated into the methodology for assessing total and additional liquidity, expressed in relative or absolute (monetary) forms. The final part presents the classification of liquidity types, its combination with the investment value of liquid and illiquid assets, as well as an example of an end-to-end calculation of the proposed values. The appendix contains calculation formulas for assessing liquidity costs. The methodology of calculations proposed in the article can be applied when assessing the investment attractiveness of assets, choosing options for placing assets in the form of cash, securities or real estate.
A Search Model of the Aggregate Demand for Safe and Liquid Assets

Ji Shen,Hongjun Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384895

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Safe and liquid assets, such as Treasury bonds, are money-like instruments that command a convenience yield. We analyze this in a search model of two assets that differ in liquidity and safety. In contrast to the reduced-form approach, which puts the safe and liquid asset in utility function, we explicitly model investors' trading needs and the trading friction. One new implication from this approach is that the marginal investor's preference for safety and liquidity is not enough in determining the premium. Instead, the distribution of investors' preferences plays a direct role. Our model implies that an increase in the supply of the liquid asset may increase or decrease the liquidity premium, depending on the distribution of investors' liquidity preference. Our model shows that investors may over- or underinvest in the search technology relative to a central planner, and that overinvestment occurs when investors' expected trading frequency is in the intermediate region.
Liquidity and Conditional Asset Pricing:Theory and Empirical Test

Dongpeng Yan,Guisheng Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6249.2006.06.006

2006-01-01

Abstract:Choosing an adequate instrument has been a focus in conditional asset pricing research. Till now, few researchers have discussed the effect of liquidity on asset pricing from this viewpoint. Departure from the framework of Breeden-Lucas Stochastic Discount Factor (SDF), our paper tries to establish a conditional CAPM with market liquidity serving as an instrument. Using the A stock's daily trading data from Jan.2, 1996 to Dec 31, 2004 of the two Chinese stock exchange markets, including Shanghai and Shenzhen, we construct illiquidity measure, Fama-French 5-by-5 portfolios and pricing factors, with which we perform a GMM estimation. Our empirical analysis shows that lagged instrument can effectively capture predictable variation of asset returns. The conditional model presents more significant power than Fama-French's three-factor model as well as the traditional CAPM, and exhibits little evidence of residual size or book-to-market effects.
A Liquidity Model of Futures Contracts and Its Empirical Analysis

LI Ze-hai,LIU Hai-long

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2012.01.005

2012-01-01

Abstract:Liquidity is an important aspect for evaluating the efficiency and maturity of a financial market.Recent many financial institutes,investors and bureaus paid much attention to it.For futures market,liquidity seems more important.With good liquidity,traders may reduce transaction cost,and Futures may perform better in leading price discovery.Furthermore,good liquidity may free Futures Exchanges out of the credit crisis.Current research work mainly focused on the liquidity models for securities market.and research work on the futures market is mostly Empirical.Few is concerned with the liquidity and liquidity orisis modeling.We propose an enhanced Amivest liquidity ratio named E-Amivest.The model overcomes the disadvantage of Amivest model that overrates the function of market tightness.Furthermore,Volume Open-Interest Ratio(VOI ratio) is proposed based on E-Amivest and empirical study shows that the VOI ratio reveals the liquidity characteristics of futures market better than other models.
Is Illiquidity Priced in the Chinese Stock Market?

Jun Liu,Kai Wu,Fuwei Jiang,Zhiqi Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3787113

IF: 2.473

2022-01-01

Accounting and Finance

Abstract:Although liquidity has received wide attention in asset pricing literature over the past decades, how stock liquidity is priced in emerging markets remains unclear. We find that liquidity plays an important role in explaining the cross-section and time-series variation in expected returns by incorporating multi-dimensional liquidity proxies in the spread, depth, and trading activity. The predictive power persists after controlling the several conventional pricing factors. We also find that the high illiquidity quintile generates higher monthly risk-adjusted returns than the low illiquidity quintile, ranging from 3.2% to 8.4% per month. The results are robust to alternative stock liquidity measures and sampling criteria. Our findings highlight the profitability of liquidity-based trading strategy in the Chinese stock market.
On the Computation of LOT Liquidity Measure

Wandi Zhao,Mingjin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.08.030

IF: 1.469

2015-01-01

Economics Letters

Abstract:Based on an extensive simulation study and a real data analysis, we show that the widely used estimation method of LOT liquidity model, i.e. the Mixed MLE method, is not consistent and the Y-split method should be used instead.

A New Measure of Liquidity

A Market-Based Funding Liquidity Measure

The Comparison Study of Liquidity Measurements on the Chinese Stock Markets

An Evaluation of Low-frequency Liquidity Proxies:An Empirical Analysis Based on the Chinese Stock Market

Measuring the Perceived Liquidity of the Corporate Bond Market

Liquidity Risk and Expected Returns in China's Stock Market: A Multidimensional Liquidity Approach

Liquidity risk and expected returns in China’s stock market: A multidimensional liquidity approach

Measuring market liquidity: An introductory survey

Study of Mutual Funds' Liquidity Index

In Search of the Best Proxy for Liquidity in Asset Pricing Studies on the Warsaw Stock Exchange

Limited Market Access and Funding Liquidity

Will Introduction of Liquidity Reduce the Utility of Wealth?——Analysis from Theory Perspective

Measuring Liquidity with Return Volatility: an Analytical Approach Based on Heavy-Tailed Censored-GARCH Model

Liquidity and Predictable Return of Shares:An Experimental Test

Stock Liquidity, Heterogenous Institutional Investors and Investment Efficiency

Liquidity phenomenon: Essence, criteria, properties and impact on the market and investment value of assets

A Search Model of the Aggregate Demand for Safe and Liquid Assets

Liquidity and Conditional Asset Pricing:Theory and Empirical Test

A Liquidity Model of Futures Contracts and Its Empirical Analysis

Is Illiquidity Priced in the Chinese Stock Market?

On the Computation of LOT Liquidity Measure