Abstract:: For a long time, China’s grassroots mass self-governance organizations, represented by urban community residents’ committees and rural villagers’ committees, as the important main body of social governance activities, have to a certain extent deviated from their functional “self-governance” function due to the “administrative” tendency in their institutional inertia. As modern social governance attaches greater importance to multi-factor participation and multi-dimensional cooperation in governance activities, the concept of governance that synergizes “self-governance and shared governance” has been given high priority in the governance of China's urban and rural communities, and has become a key element in the “common building, common governance and shared sharing” social governance system and governance system of the times, which is highly characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The concept of “self-governance and shared governance” has been highly valued in the governance of urban and rural communities in China, and has been embodied in the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity, which is very characteristic of the socialist era with Chinese characteristics. In this process, the Party’s leadership has been consistently applied throughout the entire process and in all aspects of grassroots governance; the political function of community Party organizations has been continuously strengthened; the leading role of grassroots Party organizations and the pioneering and exemplary role of Party members have been fully brought into play, leading to the high-quality development of community governance; democratic self-governance of the grassroots in the community has been effectively promoted, and grass-roots practice of people’s democracy in the entire process has been perfected; importance has been attached to fostering the professional qualities of community workers, and to upgrading the professional qualities of community leaders represented by neighborhood and village committees. The way to develop and improve China’s practice of community governance in the new era is paying attention to fostering the professional qualifications of community workers and improving the self-governance capacity of grass-roots mass self-governance organizations represented by neighborhood committees and village committees.

The International Experience and Enlightenment of Community Governance

Community Governance in Transitional Urban China

Innovation of Contemporary Chinese Urban Community Governance under the Perspective of Social Capital: Participation of Multiple Subjects Based on Community Proposals

Communal China:Enhancing the Foundation of State Governance Through Communities

Led by the Party Building: The Construction of Urban and Rural Community Governance System Under the Concept of Self-governance and Co-governance

Community Governance Reform in Urban China: A Case Study of the Yantian Model in Shenzhen

Empowered Autonomy: The Politics of Community Governance Innovations in Shanghai, China

Research on International Community Governance——Taking Chaoyang District in Beijing As an Example

Double Building of the Government and Society:The Practical Proposition of Public Governance

Do Civic Education Influences Matter? China'S Civic Education And Its Implication To The Transition Of Governance

Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance

The Exploration of A New Type of Social Organization:An Investigation on Possibilities of Government's Empowerment of Society through the Practice of Social Composite Subject in Hangzhou

Community Renewal under Multi-Stakeholder Co-Governance: A Case Study of Shanghai's Inner City

Structural Transformation and Governance Mechanism on Urban Community Governance

A New Top-Down Governance Approach to Community Gardens: A Case Study of the “We Garden” Community Experiment in Shenzhen, China

Moderate Community Self-Governing and Path Choice——Based on Comparing Community Governance of Hong Kong with Mainland

From "administrative Communities" to "civil Communities"--analyzing Secular Trends in Chinese Urban "community Building" Using Comparative Methods

Who Can Represent Us? A Case Study on Community Governance

The Interaction between “Activation” and “Absorption”:A Model of Social Governance in China as A Performance of Deliberative Democracy

Residents' Voluntary Spirit in Constructing Local Service-oriented Government——Take the Constructing Service-oriented Government and Residents' Community Voluntary of Nanjing City as an Example

Service-oriented Government Building on Social Governance Practices