Abstract:: For a long time, China’s grassroots mass self-governance organizations, represented by urban community residents’ committees and rural villagers’ committees, as the important main body of social governance activities, have to a certain extent deviated from their functional “self-governance” function due to the “administrative” tendency in their institutional inertia. As modern social governance attaches greater importance to multi-factor participation and multi-dimensional cooperation in governance activities, the concept of governance that synergizes “self-governance and shared governance” has been given high priority in the governance of China's urban and rural communities, and has become a key element in the “common building, common governance and shared sharing” social governance system and governance system of the times, which is highly characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The concept of “self-governance and shared governance” has been highly valued in the governance of urban and rural communities in China, and has been embodied in the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity, which is very characteristic of the socialist era with Chinese characteristics. In this process, the Party’s leadership has been consistently applied throughout the entire process and in all aspects of grassroots governance; the political function of community Party organizations has been continuously strengthened; the leading role of grassroots Party organizations and the pioneering and exemplary role of Party members have been fully brought into play, leading to the high-quality development of community governance; democratic self-governance of the grassroots in the community has been effectively promoted, and grass-roots practice of people’s democracy in the entire process has been perfected; importance has been attached to fostering the professional qualities of community workers, and to upgrading the professional qualities of community leaders represented by neighborhood and village committees. The way to develop and improve China’s practice of community governance in the new era is paying attention to fostering the professional qualifications of community workers and improving the self-governance capacity of grass-roots mass self-governance organizations represented by neighborhood committees and village committees.

Moderate Community Self-Governing and Path Choice——Based on Comparing Community Governance of Hong Kong with Mainland

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Community Governance in Transitional Urban China

Who Can Represent Us? A Case Study on Community Governance

Community Governance Reform in Urban China: A Case Study of the Yantian Model in Shenzhen

The International Experience and Enlightenment of Community Governance

Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance

What Is the Rational Choice of Community Governance Policy

Exploration of urban community renewal governance for adaptive improvement

Led by the Party Building: The Construction of Urban and Rural Community Governance System Under the Concept of Self-governance and Co-governance

Structure Innovation of Self-government Model in Urban Community:from Community Councils on

DISCUSSION ON MODELS OF URBAN GOVERNANCE AND THE APPLICATION IN CHINA

Structural Transformation and Governance Mechanism on Urban Community Governance

GOVERNANCE OF URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS :A CASE OF SHAOXING

Why Does Homeowners' Cross-Neighborhood Organizational Coalition in Shanghai Differ from That in Guangzhou? A City-Level Comparative Analysis of the Governance Structures and Political Opportunities (Threats)

SOE Reform:A Deepening Study Based on Connotational Function of Management and Governance

A New Top-Down Governance Approach to Community Gardens: A Case Study of the “We Garden” Community Experiment in Shenzhen, China

How are New Community Governance Structures Formed in Urban China?

Connotation· Model· Value: the Review, Comparison and Expectation on Urban Governance Research in Western Counties and China

Local Versus Global: Corporate Governance Practices in Chinese Domestic and Overseas Companies

Smart city community governance system based on online and offline aggregation services