State‐Society Relations and the Discourses and Activities of the 1989 Beijing Student Movement
DX Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/210467
IF: 4.8
2000-01-01
American Journal of Sociology
Abstract:Many writings emphasize the importance of Chinese culture to the 1989 Beijing Student Movement. Comparing the 1989 movement to the May 4th movement of 1919 and to the December 9th movement of 1935-36, this study finds the rhetoric and activity patterns of the 1989 movement to be actually more traditional than those of its forerunners. This is quite a paradox, considering the scale of social change in China during the 20th century. This article argues that the 1989 movement's traditionalist outlook can be explained by three structural conditions, all involving state-society relations. In comparison with the states of the earlier movements, the state during the 1980s had a higher capacity for repression. To avoid immediate repression, students tended to hide their real demands and goals behind safer and culturally congenial forms of action. Second, China in the 1980s had comparatively weaker independent civil organizations. Hence, the movement was poorly organized, and competing activities frequently occurred in the same time and location. What determined the efficacy of these activities then were less the actors' intentions than the perception of those who were observing the movement. This study argues that people's acceptance of particular movement activities is shaped by their perception of state legitimation. During the 1980s, most Chinese saw that the state's legitimacy lay in its moral performance, close to what was in traditional China. Therefore, people were more receptive to culturally and morally charged movement activities. This furthered the domination of traditionalism during the 1989 movement.