Comparison of fenestration,suction drainage and curettage for odontogenic cystic lesions of the jaw bones

DU Jiao,JIN Wu-long
2013-01-01
Abstract:PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of fenestration and decompression technique,suction drainage and curettage for odontogenic cystic lesions of the jaws bones.METHODS: Odontogenic cystic lesions of jaw bones with a maximum diameter bigger than 3.5 cm were served as group one,and subdivided into group A(fenestration and decompression technique) and group B(suction drainage) according to the patients' desire.The lesions with a maximum diameter less than 3.5 cm were served as group two,and subdivided into group A(fenestration and decompression technique) and group B(curettage) according to the patients' desire.The evaluation for group one and two was done by measuring the cystic lesion during the treatment and comparing the speed of the reduction of the cystic area by panoramic view.Statistical analysis was performed after quantification for the lesions reduction using SPSS 11.0 software package.RESULTS: The healing of cystic cavity was good both in group A and group B of group one.After 6 months,the percentage of the reduction for the lesion volume was 63.66% and 83.52 %,respectively;the percentage of the reduction for the lesion area was 65.86% and 88.65 %.There was significant difference between them(P<0.05).In group B(surgery alone) of group two,after 6 months,the jaw bone had normal shape and the efficiency was 100%.In group A of group two,the efficiency was 60%.CONCLUSIONS: Suction drainage had a better effect for big jaw cystic lesions than fenestration and decompression technique.It is worthy of wide application.Surgical curettage is applicable to small odontogenic cystic lesions of the jaw bones.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?