Abstract:The integrated development of urban and rural areas requires that the government take responsibility for the overall development of the countryside. Chinese agricultural and rural policies characterized by state intervention and government leadership have played an important role in promoting agricultural development and increasing farmers' incomes as well as balancing development in urban and rural areas. However, the effectiveness of current agricultural policies in promoting agricultural productivity is now clearly leveling off. Given this situation, the authors argue that it is imperative to construct a new analytical framework featuring government regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development. In this framework, the government must clearly define the boundaries between its activities and those of the market and rural social organizations. While fully respecting the fundamental role of the market in allocation of resources and rural self-management, the government should exercise its power as a backstop. Further, the government needs to establish a logical sequence for government functions such as formulating the basic operating system of the market and society, correcting market failure and social dysfunction and cultivating market/social entities. To use this new analytical framework to strengthen and improve its regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development, the government needs to reform the basic rural management and agricultural support and protection systems and to pay attention to the cultivation of market entities in agricultural production on the basis of agricultural marketization. Furthermore, it needs to construct a basic urban-rural integrated public service system with the government as the leading actor, carry out innovations in the management system of rural society and fully mobilize the social forces to take part in the administration of public affairs. It also needs to reconstruct the system of government administration and management to ensure the thorough implementation of agricultural and rural development policies.

Six Key Issues in the Construction of Service Government

The Service-Oriented Government in China:Past,Present and the Future

Public Services Division in the Vision of Service-Oriented Government

The Zhejiang Pattern of Service-oriented Government Construction

Reflections on the Transformation of Local Government Function --the Case of Zhejiang Province

On the Role Position of Government in the Infrastructure Building of Cities and Towns

On Community Health Service System Ethics Construction

A Brief Account on the Administrative Idea of Service Government

Reform Agenda For The Building Of Service-Oriented Government In China: Implications From Welfare Regime Analysis

Double Building of the Government and Society:The Practical Proposition of Public Governance

China’s Public Service System:Developments of Social Policy, Institution and Mechanism

The Construction of New State and Good Government

Service-oriented Government Building on Social Governance Practices

On the Sixth Industries and How to Govern Chinese Electronic Services

A Study of Urban Public Goods Supply & Demand in Service-oriented Government Construction——Based on Questionnaires Collected in Shenzhen

Service Government and Administrative Reform:A Theory of Collective Public Service Provision

The Construction of Public Service Government in the Sight of Scientific Development View

An Evaluation System of Local Government Public Service Quality and its Application

The Relationship Between Government on One Side and the Market and Society on the Other in China's Agricultural and Rural Development: an Analytical Framework

The Impact of Network Structure Elements on the Building of Service-Oriented Government in China from the Perspective of Network Governance

City Government in the New Countryside Construction