Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs in identifying periapical bone lesions
Jie ZHANG,Lin YUE,Wan-lin ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2013.s1.002
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the difference in identifing periapical bone lesions between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiographs (PR).Methods Ten healthy maxillary incisors and 38 maxillary incisors which were diagnosed as apical periodontitis in clinic were included.All the teeth were taken with PR,and periapical index (PAI) was determined.All the teeth were taken with CBCT,and the longest diameter of incisorgingival,mesiodistal and labiapalatal dimension of bone lesion were measured and compared in axial,sagittal and coronal view separately.Results When PAI was 1,the image of PR and CBCT showed normal state of periapical region.When PAI was 2,the image of CBCT showed bone lesion in periapical region.When PAI were 3,4,5,the range of longest diameter of incisorgingival dimension were 2.75-7.00,4.51-10.63,6.75-13.38 mm,mesiodistal dimension were 1.88-4.13,3.98-7.25,5.38-10.63 mm,labiapalatal dimension were 1.50-5.70,2.63-6.25,4.50-9.91 mm.Within every grade the range of the longest diameter of bone lesion in all three dimensions varied.Among the three grades,the range of the longest diameter in same dimension was overlapped.Conclusions CBCT could show the bone lesion that PR couldn't.Use of PR in identifying bone lesion may underestimate the size of the lesion.