Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in diagnosis of periapical bone defect in human jaws

Lan JIANG,Chen CHEN,Xue-jun GAO,Yu-hong LIANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2013.s1.001
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the periapical radiography (PR)with cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT) in diagnostic accuracy of periapical bone defect.Methods A total of 169 periapical bone defects in human jaws were prepared in vitro and 37 roots without preparation of bone defect served as control at the base of extraction sockets.The 169 roots with simulated lesions and 37 roots without lesions were examined by CBCT and PR.The images were evaluated by one radiologist and one endodontic doctor.Results Fifty-two lesions (30.8%) were invisible on PR.The positive and negative predictive values and accuracy for CBCT in diagnosing periapical lesions were all 1.000,compared to 1.000,0.416 and 0.748 for PR.Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that detection of lesions using PR was significantly influenced by tooth position(OR =2.319 > 1,P < 0.001).Forty-four point zero percent of lesions associated with premolars and molars were invisible,only 1.9% of the lesions associated with anterior teeth were invisible.Conclusions CBCT is more accurate than PR in diagnosing periapical lesions of mandibular teeth.Tooth position might be a risk factor to influnce the diagnostic accuracy of PA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?