Medium term follow-up of donor safety in adult living donor kidney transplantation

ZHANG Lei,PAN Guang-hui,HUANG Gang,WANG Chang-xi,FEI Ji-guang,QIU Jiang,LI Jun,CHEN Guo-dong,DENG Su-xiong,FU Qian,CHEN Li-zhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2011.04.003
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the post-transplant conditions and evaluate midterm living quality and safety of living renal donors.Methods Eighty-seven donors of renal transplantation were followed up in medium term after transplantation.The follow-up content included questionnaire survey,complications and renal function.Results The period of follow-up was from 12 months to 65 months after transplantation.Nine cases(10 %) of donors considered that donation may adversely affect the marriage.Fifty-one cases(59 %) of donors felt a little pain in the incision.Fifty-three cases(61 %) claimed to experience a decrease in physical strength.Twenty-three(26 %) changed jobs because of the donation.The average time of returning to work was 106 d after transplantation.Two cases(2 %) suffered from depression frequently.Eight-six cases(99 %) never regretted of donation.Five cases(6 %)had newly diagnosed hypertension,2 cases(2 %) with abnormal glucose tolerance,4 cases(5 %)with hematuria,6 cases(7 %) with proteinuria and 41 cases(47 %) with dyslipidemia.The mean serum creatinine level of preoperation,postoperation and follow-up time were respectively(65±14) μmol/L,(98±22) μmol/L,(88±17) μmol/L.Their creatinine clearance rate was respectively(95±21) ml/min before donation,(65±16) ml/min at discharge,(71±17) ml/min at the latest follow-up.There was significant difference in these two renal function evaluation parameters(all in P<0.01).Conclusion Slight decline in living quality of donors was observed after nephrectomy while the renal function of living donors appears to be relatively excellent.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?