Renal biopsy findings of living-related donors and their correction with post-surgery recovery

CHEN Zheng,PAN Guang-hui,FANG Jia-li,LIAO De-huai,LI Guang-hui,DU Yang-chun,XU Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2011.01.012
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the potential pathological changes of living-related donor kidney and the correlation between pathological changes and post-surgery recovery.Methods From May 2007.to July 2008 kidney biopsy were performed in 59 living-related donors during surgeries.None of the donors has abnormal findings at preoperative examinations.Relationship between the kidney biopsy findings and recovery of donors were analyzed.Results Fifty nine renal biopsies were performed during operations,and pathological changes were found in 14 cases,including mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis in 1 case,renal small artery intimal hyperplasia and hyaline degeneration in 1 case,glomerular basement membrane thickening or mesentery proliferative lesions in 6 cases and glomerulosclerosis in 6 cases respectively.For donors without pathological changes in their kidneys,the percentage of donors with high-than-normal serum creatinine level after operation was 28.9﹪,and the creatinine level became normal after 1.22 ± 2.11 days.Also the incidence of proteinuria after operation was about 77.8﹪and it lasted 3.67 ± 2.45 days.For donors with pathological changes in their kidneys,the percentage of donors with high-than-normal serum creatinine level after operation was about 50.0﹪ and he creatinine level became normal after 4.20 ± 6.71 days.The incidence of proteinuria was about 71.4﹪ and it lasted 4.20 ± 4.76 days.In 33 donors younger than 55 years,7 were found to have pathological changes in kidney,while in 26 donors older than 55 years,7 were found to have pathological changes in kidney.Conclusions There is no significant differences in the incidence of abnormal Scr level and proteinuria,and the duration of abnormal Scr level and proteinuria between donors with or without pathologic changes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?