Abstract:The classical theories of asset pricing are being suspected and leaving"puz- zles"unsolved for many years,and utility function has been the obstacle of development of as- set pricing theory.Assuming asset prices follow Ito processes Chen and Sun(2007)estab- lished a new asset pricing model based on value indifference platform,where the value indif- ference judgments become the precondition of the utility indifference judgments.And then the model is extended to the case where asset prices follow normal distributions.This model es- tablishes the direct quantitative relationship between return and risk,and hints value indiffer- ence among stocks,risky bonds and riskless assets,and also the long-term equilibriums based on the value indifference.A new risk factor investment evaluation period T is imported to the unified equilibrium structure,which displays a wide research field in the future.Using stock market data this article tries to provide empirical evidences to supporting the quantitative rela- tionship and investment evaluation period indicated by the model,and also explain the equity premium puzzle at the same time.The results show that this model can interpret the equity premiums in America,China mainland and Hong Kong stock markets respectively,even the returns of these markets have different standard deviations.For details the average risk pre- miums converge to the theoretical values calculated by the model,and the differences between actual risk premiums and their theoretical correspondences are very small(less than 2% in most cases)and not significant.By simulations of 100 000 times,we find that the curve of ac- tual values crosses that of theoretical values at the point where the investment evaluation peri- od is about one year,which is consistent with our prior analysis.The simulation results are perfect in America stock market while there are a little larger errors in China mainland and Hong Kong stock markets.The probable reason is that the theoretical values are sensitive near the convergence points and the short histories of China mainland and Hong Kong stock markets induce larger influences of returns of certain years and so larger volatilities of long- term means.Actually this problem reveals the huge application spaces of the model in emer- ging markets.Moreover the calculation errors induced by the lack of appropriate riskless re- turns in the two markets may be another reason.To summarize the empirical evidences sup- port our opinion that this model can precisely describe the relationship between return and risk of market portfolio and explain the equity premium puzzle successfully.The results indi- cate that the high risk premiums of stock markets are a kind of compensation for the probable losses when the investment evaluation period of investors is about one year.Moreover we also test the model under normal distribution using America stock market data and get the same conclusions.

Research on Overconfidence and Risk Premium

The Credibility Estimate of Risk Premium Under Dependent Risks

Empirical Bayes Estimators of Risk Premium under Variance Related Premium Principle

An Empirical Study of Liquidity Risk Premium in Chinese Stock Markets

Experience Rating of Risk Premium for Esscher Premium Principle

A Robust General Equilibrium Stochastic Volatility Model with Recursive Preference Investors

Liquidity risk,liquidity demand of investors and asset pricing

An Empirical Study on the Overconfidence of Investors under the Overall Perspective

Does Overconfidence Always Matter for Asset Prices?

Study on investment, consumption and risk premium under rat trade condition

Overconfidence,Limited Participation and Asset Price Bubbles

The Overconfident, or the More Informed?

A Comment on the Modeling Methods in Overconfidence Research

The Study on Overconfidence and Overtrading of Chinese Individual Investors

What are the Factors that Induce the Irrational Behaviors?

Empirical Study on Behavior Mechanism of Individual Investors with Limited Rational

Can Rational Investors Overreact?

An Empirical Investigation for Value-Indifference-Based Asset Pricing Model—With an Explanation for the Equity Premium Puzzle

Optimal Consumption and Investment under Irrational Beliefs

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING INVESTORS DECISION MAKING

The impact of individual and institutional investor sentiment on the market price of risk