Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the traumatic responses following microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and open discectomy. METHODS:Forty-four patients with single level lumbar disk herniation underwent MED (Group A, n = 22) or open discectomy (Group B, n = 22). The intra-operational blood loss, duration of operation, intra-operative blood loss, and post-operational hospital stay were noted and the pain severity of incision was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Serum levels of IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and creatine kinase (CK) were measured before operation and 24 h and 48 h after operation. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by Oswestry disability index (ODI) before operation and 6 months after operation. RESULTS:The intra-operative blood loss of Group A was 47.50 +/- 11.62 ml, significantly less than that of Group B (129.11 +/- 71.75 ml, P < 0.01), the duration of operation of Group A was 64.77 +/- 17.83, significantly shorter than that of Group B (78.18 +/- 24.32, P < 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay of Group A was 6.09 +/- 2.22 days, significantly shorter than that of Group B (8.73 +/- 3.53, P < 0.01). The scores of VAS 1, 2, and 3 days after the operation were all significantly lower than those of Group B (all P < 0.001). The rate of remarkable symptomatic improvement of Group A was 94.7%, not significantly different from that of Group B (94.4%, P > 0.05) The serum IL-6 showed no significant difference between these 2 groups pre-operationally, and peaked 24 h after operation and decreased 48 h after operation in both groups, returning to the pre-operational level in Group A. The IL-6 level 24 h and 48 h post-operationally of Group A was 31.6 +/- 9.88 pg/ml and 26.25 +/- 9.30 pg/ml respectively, both significantly lower than those of Group B (39.16 +/- 11.14 pg/ml and 32.55 +/- 8.83 pg/ml respectively, both P < 0.05) The serum CK showed no significant difference between these 2 groups pre-operationally, and peaked 24 h after operation and decreased 48 h after operation, but still higher than those before operation, in both groups. The serum CK 24 h and 48 h after operation of Group A were 167.91 +/- 51.85 and 131.50 +/- 52.70 U/L respectively, both significantly lower than those of Group B (401.55 +/- 108.86 and 260.32 +/- 64.98 U/L, both P < 0.01). The serum CRP level showed no significant difference between these 2 groups pre-operationally, and increased post-operationally, peaked 24 h after operation and then decreased in Group A, however, continued to increase in Group B. The serum levels of CRP 24 h and 48 h post-operationally of Group A were 12.68 +/- 7.10 and 10.77 +/- 5.25 pg/ml, both significantly lower than those of Group B (20.82 +/- 8.79 and 29.95 +/- 14.85 pg/ml, both P < 0.01). The clinical outcomes 6 months after operation of these two groups were all satisfying. CONCLUSION:Both MED and open discectomy show good clinical outcomes in treatment of single level lumbar disk herniation, however, the less responses of serum IL-6, CRP, and CK show that the MED procedure is less traumatic.

Microdiscectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of Outcomes Between Tubular Microdiscectomy and Conventional Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of Discectomy Versus Sequestrectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Effects Between Traditional Open Discectomy and Microendoscopy (MED) for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Operative treatmeat of the lumbar disc herniation with microendoscopic discectomy

Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

Comparative Study of Microendoscopic Disecetomy and Fenestration Discectomy for Mono-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparative study on lumbar microsurgery lumbar discectomy and traditional open discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Micro Lumbar Discectomy under Arthroscopy

Comparison of mid-term effects between microendoscopic discectomy and microsurgical lumbar discectomy for operatively treating lumbar disc herniation

Analysis of Reoperation Causes of Microinvasive Endoscopic Discectomy and That of Open Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Study on Posterior Approach Microendoscopic Discectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Minial Invasival Study and Clinical Application of Lumbar Discectomy Via Percutaneous Endoscopic Approach vs on ;Lumber Disk Herniation

Microendoscopic Discectomy, a Less Traumatic Procedure for Lumbar Disk Herniation.

Clinical Results Following Microsurgical Discectomy: Comparison of Microscope and Loupes

Clinical study of Microendoscopic Discectomy + Fibrous Ring Suture Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy alone in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in young and middle-aged patients

[Traumatic Responses Following Microendoscopic Discectomy: Clinical Analysis of 44 Patients].

[Micro-Endoscopic Strategies and Options for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation].

Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy: a follow-up exceeding five years

Comparison of the effectiveness and outcome of microendoscopic and open discectomy in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation