Abstract:Since China's reform and opening up,its infrastructure has been improved dramatically,creating the so-called infrastructure miracle.As we have already known that intra-region trade costs and inter-region trade cost,which are determined by the quality of infrastructure,have crucial effects on the spatial distribution of industries across regions within a country.Adopting the footloose capital model,we investigate the effects of trade cost differences due to infrastructure quality on regional industrial agglomeration,regional gap and social welfare.The main findings of the paper are listed as follows.(1) The residents of the less developed areas will benefit both from the improvement of the intra-region infrastructure of the less developed areas and/or of the inter-region infrastructure between the developed and the less developed ones.However,the mechanisms of the two policies are different.The policy of improving the infrastructure in the less developed areas has direct and indirect effects,both of which benefit the residents within it.The direct effect is more clearly visible in the rapid improvements in the infrastructure,while the indirect effect takes more time to be fully realized.This finding explains the common phenomenon of the low utilization of the infrastructure in the backward areas.The policy of improving inter-region infrastructure benefits the residents of the less developed areas through decreasing import cost.However,when the infrastructure in developed areas is better than that in less developed areas,this kind of policy will not only widen the regional gap as industries agglomerate around developed areas,but also widen regional income inequity.A new perspective for us to consider the relationship between industrial agglomeration and regional gap is that the industrial agglomeration caused by the infrastructure differences between developed areas and less developed ones may to some extent account for the widening income gap.(2) The residents of the less developed areas will benefit from the improvement of the infrastructure as industries spread to these areas,while the residents of the developed ones may enjoy fewer welfare benefits.There is high probability that this kind of policy may cut down the total social welfare benefits when both the industrial-size gap and the infrastructure gap between regions are significant.This finding has significant implications for the central government in making policies for regional coordination.If coordinated regional development is a long term target of the central government,early investment in the infrastructure in the less developed areas is vital.If the investment is delayed until considerable gap develops between regions,an overall efficiency loss may occur and the economic development in the earlier stages will be greatly hampered.(3) The main policy implication of this paper is that the optimal policy of the central government to improve the infrastructure depends on the initial levels of industrial sizes and infrastructure of the two regions.When the size difference between regional economies is small,when the trade barriers between regions are high,and when the less developed areas have significant investment cost advantage in improving the intra-region infrastructure,the central government should choose to invest in the infrastructure in less developed areas to maximize the total social welfare. One limitation of this study is that we only assume the public expenditure on infrastructure to be exogenous.In more general and realistic situations,local governments actually rely on tax revenue to finance infrastructure investments.One interesting extension would be to introduce tax policy into our model in order to better explain the strategic behaviors of local governments and their impact on industrial agglomeration and economic development.

Policy Analyses of Revitalizing the Old Industrial Base in the Northeast

DEVELOPING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS PROCESSING INDUSTRY FOR REVITALIZING ECONOMY OF THE OLD INDUSTRIAL BASED ON NORTHEAST CHINA——AN ANALYSIS BASED ON SURVEY IN CHANGCHUN,SHENYANG,HARBIN

Infrastructure,Industrial Agglomeration and Regional Coordination

Interregional Economic Linkage and Regional Development Driving Forces Based on an Interregional Input-Output Analysis of China

Analysis on the Land Use Policies for Restructuring and Upgrading Industries: A Survey in the Shanghai-Zhejiang-Fujian Region

New Urbanization Strategy for Revitalizing the Tradianal Industrial Base of Northeast China

SPATIAL REUSE STRATEGIES OF OLD INDUSTRIAL BASES IN NORTHEAST CHINA: FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LANDSCAPE REVITALIZATION

Analysis of Energy Structure in Northeast China

The Evaluation of the Old Industrial Base Transformation—With the Development of Modern Service Industrial Cluster in Liaoning Province as an Example

Theoretical Study of Inner-Mechanism in Regional Coordinated Development

Re-examination of the Strategic Superiority of Our Country's Mid-western Part under the New Situations

Problems with and Treatment of the Interactive and Coordinated Development of Northern,Middle and Southern of Jiangsu

A Preliminary Study of the Lagging Economic Development in the North of Anhui Province

On Resource and Industrial Policies for Achieving the Coordinated Development of All Regions

Regional Economic Disparity in China,and Suggestions on Policy Making

Did place-based industrial policy promote regional economic growth? ---- Evidence from China

Analyzing Industrial Structure Evolution of Old Industrial Cities Using Evolutionary Resilience Theory:A Case Study in Shenyang of China

Integrating the Studies of Revitalizing Northeast China with the Endogenous Growth Theory

Impact of relocation and reconstruction policies on the upgrading of urban industrial structure in old industrial districts

Problem Analysis of Urban-Rural Industrial Land Use in Metropolitan Areas Under the New Urbanization Policy—A Case Study of Shanghai

Rural Economic Development Based on Shift-Share Analysis in a Developing Country: A Case Study in Heilongjiang Province, China