Abstract:After the Meiji Restoration in 1868, Japan rapidly industrialized, greatly raising its level of economic productivity. However, the peasants were kept in a state of hunger under a semifeudal agricultural system. How should this semi-feudality be understood? About this question arose a debate among Japanese Marxists in prewar Japan: the Debate on Japanese Capitalism. This article examines the methodologies of three analysists of Japanese capitalism focusing on the level of abstraction of the analysis of capitalism, whose ideas were derived from Hegel’s Logic and Marx’s methodology of downward analysis and upward development: Moritarō Yamada of Kōzaha, Itsurō Sakisaka of Rōnōha, and Kōzō Uno, who distanced himself from both sides. Uno criticized Yamada and Sakisaka for directly analyzing a particular Japanese capitalism with a highly general theory such as Capital, and proposed the Three-Stage Theory: the Pure Theory, which is based on the assumption of a pure capitalism, such as Marx’s Capital; the Stage Theory, which clarifies the historical developmental stage of capitalism, such as Lenin’s Imperialism (1917); and the Empirical Analysis, which analyzes capitalism in each country at a given time. However, Uno’s main concern was to analyze Japanese capitalism in the Stage Theory, doing little to further advance it in the Empirical Analysis. Therefore, this article divided the Empirical Analysis into two levels of abstraction: the domain of theoretical construction of Japanese Capitalism, such as Lenin’s Development of Capitalism in Russia (1899), and of data analysis of specific conditions of Japanese capitalism, such as Engels’ The Condition of the Working Class in England (1844), and thus proposed the Four-Stage Theory. It is a hypothesis for complementing Uno’s Three-Stage Theory, which should be further developed by data. Finally, such methodological consideration for analyzing capitalism is applicable to non-Japanese capitalist societies.

"Japanese Marxism":A New Academic Category

New Profound Consideration of Western Marxism (Seminar)

Western Marxism's Theoretical Nature and Its Implications for China

The Process of Marxist Educational Thoughts Entering China: Selection,integration and Development

Comments on Japanese "Early Marx" Controversy:The Significances of Glossen zu James Mill on the Reconstruction of Marx’s Alienation Theory

Some Issues in Study of "Analytical Marxism"

A Review of Marxism Studies in the West by Chinese Scholars

Marxism and the Debate on the Transition to Capitalism in Prewar Japan

Marxist State Theory in a Globalized Age

Studies in Marxism Abroad:Four Routes and Evaluation

New Insights into Western Marxism

The Latest Developments of Western Marxism(Symposium)

Seiji Mochizuki’s Studies on Marx’Historical Theory of Civic Society

"China's Approach to Development" with the Perspective of German Marxism

New Trends of Development of Marxism in Germany since the Year 2000

Reflections on the Integrated Studies of Chinanization, Eranization,and Popularization of Marxism

Mapping Western Marxism: On Zhang Yi-bing’s Deep Plough of Texts

On the Historic Destiny of Marxism Historiography in China

Innovation on Studying Mode of Marxism Philosophy

“British Marxism”:Its History,Mode of Theorizing and Achievements in Historical Materialism

Following the USSR Model, Drawing on Western Marxism,and Localizing Marxism in China——Retrospection and Reflection on Studies of History of Marxist Philosophy in China in 30 Years