Social Work in Disaster Intervention: Accounts from the Grounds of Sichuan
Hok Bun Ku,David Ip,Yue-gen Xiong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17525090903211408
2009-01-01
China Journal of Social Work
Abstract:Natural disasters are a regular feature of China. On 12 May 2008, an 8.0 magnitude earthquake struck Sichuan province, a mountainous region in western China, in which nearly 70,000 people died, 18,000 went missing and affecting over 15 million people. Where physical infrastructures are concerned, 21 million buildings were damaged and 7,000 schools were destroyed. As a helping profession, social work in Western societies has a long history in dealing with the aftermath of natural disasters such as hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes and snow storms. It has been well documented that social work is most effective in traumatic stress management, delivery of resources and services to vulnerable populations (Galambos 2005, Mitchell 1983, Van den Eynde and Veno 1999, Zakours 1996), formulation and implementation of different service plans (Banerjee and Gillespie 1994, Dodds and Nuehring 1996), community organization and advocacy (Pyles 2007). As Yanay and Benjamin (2005, pp. 263, 271) rightly concluded, responding to disasters is ‘part of social work practice and profession’ and ‘social workers are the professionals best prepared to deal with complex situations resulting from an emergency’. In the past, social work interventions in disasters have mostly focused on the work of relief and recovery for the affected individuals, families, communities and organizations, and meeting the special needs of vulnerable groups (Cherry and Cherry 1996, Shahar 1993, Zakours 1996). However, some researchers believe that provision of relief and services is far too limiting a role for social work as a profession. Certainly, disaster causes destruction, traumas and tragedies, but emerging from them are also opportunities for social change and development. As the UN Disaster Relief Organization (1992, p. 202) aptly commented, ‘disasters often create a political and economic atmosphere wherein extensive changes can be made more rapidly than under normal circumstance’. Nonetheless, some argued that in order for a disaster-affected area to overcome the devastation it has experienced and to embark on a sustainable pathway to reconstruction, empowerment and participation of local community organizations and residents are critical (Harrell and Zakour 2000, Ozerdem 2003, Pyles 2007, Vandeventer 2004, Zedlewski 2006). In this context, Dominelli (2009, pp. 141–2) was correct to highlight that the role for social worker in disaster intervention indeed is multifarious – as facilitator, coordinator, community mobilizer, negotiator, broker and educator. As a newly-emerged profession, social work in China, however, is much less prepared in responding to disaster intervention. Prior to the 12 May (or 5.12) Sichuan earthquake, social work intervention in managing disaster simply did not appear in the academic or practice agenda of social work training. Not surprisingly when the Sichuan earthquake struck, few social workers in China were ready for working with the disaster-affected communities. Later when they were called upon to engage in disaster relief, many felt they