Abstract:Although online live-streaming marketing shows nowadays play an important role in stimulating consumption and activating economic circulation, problems also arise and become more prominent, especially reflected from the marketing participants who are suspected of monopoly damage to the order of market competition. However, due to the absence of applicable antitrust norms for online live-streaming marketing, the legislation by far is insufficient for the determination of the subject in the process of the Anti-Monopoly Law. Worse still, there are legislative defects in constituting monopoly agreements and complex factors affecting the dominant market position. In recent years, foreign countries have attached great importance to the Internet antitrust issue and taken a number of powerful measures, such as the implementation of the hub-and-spoke conspiracy for identifying Internet platform and the clarification of the platform monopoly "synergistic behavior" judgment standards, etc., which is worthy of reference. China, in this sense, should adopt the antitrust law rules for the determination of the unincorporated form of the subjects in online live-streaming marketing, improve the identification path of online live-streaming marketing constituting the hub-and-spoke Conspiracy and collaborative behavior, update the determination criteria of the market dominance in the online live-streaming marketing and enrich the antitrust law determination procedure. All these methods will help to optimize the antitrust law identification path of the online live-streaming marketing.

The Textual Characteristics of Anti-Monopoly Law of PRC——Taking the Case of Abuse of Dominant Market Position as an Example

Antitrust control of mergers and acquisitions: a case study of China

Does China need competition law?

Values of Anti-monopoly Law

Administrative Monopoly and the Anti-Monopoly Law: an examination of the debate in China

Status of the Comparatively Dominant Position in Antimonopoly Law

The Model of "Structure—Function" on the Aim of Anti-monopoly Law——Review of the First Article of China's Antimonopoly Law

GOVERNING CHINA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MONOPOLIES UNDER THE ANTI-MONOPOLY LAW: A TEN-YEAR REVIEW (2008–2018) AND BEYOND

Abuse of Market Dominance under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law: the Case of Tetra Pak

The Essential Facilities Doctrine and the Regulation of the Abuse of Market Dominant Position

Thirty Years' Development of China's Anti-monopoly Law under the Yardstick of "State-Market":Toward "Autonomous-Responsive" Law

Professional Associations on the View of the Anti-monopoly Law

Cause Analysis and Enlightenment of “Certainty” in China’s Anti-monopoly Administrative Law Enforcement and Prospect of Law Enforcement in Tobacco Industry

The Regulation to Industrial Association in China's "antimonopoly Law"

Anti-Monopoly Cases On Unfair Pricing In China

Foreign‐invested companies: more risky facing up to China's anti‐monopoly law?

The Study on Issues Related to Anti-monopoly Regulation on Large-scale Retail Enterprises Abusing the Dominant Position:Based on the View of Two-sided Markets Theory

On the Conditions of Protection of Business Achievements Via the Anti-Unfair Competition Law--An Analysis of Some Leading Cases

Research on the Path of Identifying the Online Live-Streaming Marketing Behaviors within the Framework of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China

Market Order of Monopoly and Anti-monopoly

Application of Anti-monopoly Law in China' s Petroleum Sector